From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Edwards To: Jason Molenda Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: a bit of gnatsweb info Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20010117173700.A9515@disaster.jaj.com> References: <20010117160543.A9059@disaster.jaj.com> <20010117131457.A3472@shell17.ba.best.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg00087.html Message-ID: <20010117142700.DOhz_La1T_Lv2Y49wQpJYoBKLxMOyiE8gGr7O2JiDmE@z> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 01:14:57PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote: > > How about not using gnatsweb? What about tkgnats? [...] > There is a gnatsd daemon running on sourceware; I did not know that. The command-line utils don't seem to be able to provide the same details as any of the others (according to the GNATS docs), and the emacs client (i.e., what gnats was designed to use) was out 'cause I didn't feel like learning a whole new OS just for the sake of closing bug reports. :-) tkgnats is looking very nice here.... Would one of you kind gnatsd admins copy my entry ("pme") from libstdc++'s gnatsd.access file to gcc's? Tonight and tomorrow I'm going to close out a bunch of old PRs in libstdc++. Figured I might assign myself some of the bugs in the gcc database in the future. Thanks for the tkgnats tip! Phil tkgnats replaces gnats, tkinfo replaces info... maybe someday i'll be hacking on tkgcc running under the TKGNU/TkLinux system... -- pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com | pme at sources dot redhat dot com devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains The gods do not protect fools. Fools are protected by more capable fools.