From: Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com>
To: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 17:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010207172418.A7649@shell17.ba.best.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20010207172400.xF9y8TlBcYe1120_8QmlFZCsPznaBCAzE7kmKOKpZbA@z> (raw)
I was curious what percentage of people were avoiding the RBL checks
by being subscribed.
Since January 1st, rbl-check.sh has consulted the actual RBLs 10,127
times. It has skipped these RBL checks 5,883 times because people
were subscribed. Of the 10,127 RBL checks, 9,672 times the messages
were let through. (the remainder were rejected because the sending
site was listed in the RBLs)
Of course, this doesn't tell the whole story - a small number of
people make up much of those 10,127 RBL checks. The top 20:
1204 anonymous@sourceware.cygnus.com
472 aoliva@redhat.com
324 tromey@creche.cygnus.com
265 mitchell@codesourcery.com
166 bryce@albatross.co.nz
163 pedwards@disaster.jaj.com
159 law@upchuck.cygnus.com
144 jsm28@srcf.ucam.org
139 drepper@redhat.com
135 ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu
130 jlarmour@redhat.com
127 dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca
120 nickc@redhat.com
105 jason@redhat.com
103 kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu
103 cwilson@ece.gatech.edu
93 corinna@vinschen.de
89 cgf@redhat.com
86 hubicka@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
74 bernds@redhat.com
Or about 4,201 of those checks in all. So if you exclude these
folks, the RBL checks have been made unnecessary for about 50% of
all senders.
Jason
next reply other threads:[~2001-02-07 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-31 19:40 Jason Molenda [this message]
2001-02-07 17:24 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-02-08 13:12 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2001-02-08 13:50 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2001-02-07 17:28 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-02-07 17:47 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2001-02-07 17:56 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-07 17:58 ` Christopher Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010207172418.A7649@shell17.ba.best.com \
--to=jason-swarelist@molenda.com \
--cc=overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).