* Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
2001-12-31 19:40 Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker Jason Molenda
@ 2001-02-07 17:24 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-02-07 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
I was curious what percentage of people were avoiding the RBL checks
by being subscribed.
Since January 1st, rbl-check.sh has consulted the actual RBLs 10,127
times. It has skipped these RBL checks 5,883 times because people
were subscribed. Of the 10,127 RBL checks, 9,672 times the messages
were let through. (the remainder were rejected because the sending
site was listed in the RBLs)
Of course, this doesn't tell the whole story - a small number of
people make up much of those 10,127 RBL checks. The top 20:
1204 anonymous@sourceware.cygnus.com
472 aoliva@redhat.com
324 tromey@creche.cygnus.com
265 mitchell@codesourcery.com
166 bryce@albatross.co.nz
163 pedwards@disaster.jaj.com
159 law@upchuck.cygnus.com
144 jsm28@srcf.ucam.org
139 drepper@redhat.com
135 ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu
130 jlarmour@redhat.com
127 dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca
120 nickc@redhat.com
105 jason@redhat.com
103 kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu
103 cwilson@ece.gatech.edu
93 corinna@vinschen.de
89 cgf@redhat.com
86 hubicka@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
74 bernds@redhat.com
Or about 4,201 of those checks in all. So if you exclude these
folks, the RBL checks have been made unnecessary for about 50% of
all senders.
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-02-07 17:28 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-02-07 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
Oh BTW the breakdown on which RBLs were giving the positive
identifications. since Jan 1, they are
273 RSS
41 MAPS DUL
25 ORBS
5 MAPS RBL
It might be interesting to flag in rbl-check.sh which of the ORBS
lists a site is listed in.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer
@ 2001-02-07 17:47 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2001-02-07 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: overseers
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Jason Molenda wrote:
> Oh BTW the breakdown on which RBLs were giving the positive
> identifications. since Jan 1, they are
I assume this list is not ``fair'' in that if we have a block from
the first RBL, we won't consult any others?
> 273 RSS
> 41 MAPS DUL
> 25 ORBS
> 5 MAPS RBL
Intuitively (and according to my experience), if you switch RSS and ORBS,
you'd get a symmetric result, right?
Gerald
--
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-02-07 17:56 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-02-07 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: overseers
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:47:04AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Jason Molenda wrote:
> > Oh BTW the breakdown on which RBLs were giving the positive
> > identifications. since Jan 1, they are
>
> I assume this list is not ``fair'' in that if we have a block from
> the first RBL, we won't consult any others?
Good point - that is the case. I think the order (this is from long-ago
memories) is MAPS, MAPS DUL, RSS, ORBS.
I was wondering why the ORBS number was so small. :-)
> Intuitively (and according to my experience), if you switch RSS and ORBS,
> you'd get a symmetric result, right?
I haven't looked in a long time, but it used to be like that. I
don't know if it's still true.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2001-02-07 17:58 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-02-07 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer, overseers
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 05:55:31PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>> Intuitively (and according to my experience), if you switch RSS and ORBS,
>> you'd get a symmetric result, right?
>
>I haven't looked in a long time, but it used to be like that. I
>don't know if it's still true.
When I was playing with things last weekend, I found some situations where
ORBS blocked things that RSS didn't but not vice versa.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Alexandre Oliva
@ 2001-02-08 13:12 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2001-02-08 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: overseers
On Feb 7, 2001, Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com> wrote:
> I was curious what percentage of people were avoiding the RBL checks
> by being subscribed.
> 1204 anonymous@sourceware.cygnus.com
> 472 aoliva@redhat.com
Sorry about all the SPAM :-)
Now, on to figure out who this anonymous@ user is, and terminate
him/her, so that I can claim the prize :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-02-08 13:50 ` Jason Molenda
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-02-08 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Oliva; +Cc: overseers
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:11:45PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > 1204 anonymous@sourceware.cygnus.com
> > 472 aoliva@redhat.com
>
> Sorry about all the SPAM :-)
>
> Now, on to figure out who this anonymous@ user is, and terminate
> him/her, so that I can claim the prize :-)
:) This is probably the gnats mail notes or something like that.
cvs messages go through a separate script (local-mail-only.sh).
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-02-07 17:47 ` Gerald Pfeifer
@ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2001-02-07 17:56 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor
1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: overseers
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:47:04AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Jason Molenda wrote:
> > Oh BTW the breakdown on which RBLs were giving the positive
> > identifications. since Jan 1, they are
>
> I assume this list is not ``fair'' in that if we have a block from
> the first RBL, we won't consult any others?
Good point - that is the case. I think the order (this is from long-ago
memories) is MAPS, MAPS DUL, RSS, ORBS.
I was wondering why the ORBS number was so small. :-)
> Intuitively (and according to my experience), if you switch RSS and ORBS,
> you'd get a symmetric result, right?
I haven't looked in a long time, but it used to be like that. I
don't know if it's still true.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2001-02-07 17:28 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-02-07 17:47 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: overseers
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Jason Molenda wrote:
> Oh BTW the breakdown on which RBLs were giving the positive
> identifications. since Jan 1, they are
I assume this list is not ``fair'' in that if we have a block from
the first RBL, we won't consult any others?
> 273 RSS
> 41 MAPS DUL
> 25 ORBS
> 5 MAPS RBL
Intuitively (and according to my experience), if you switch RSS and ORBS,
you'd get a symmetric result, right?
Gerald
--
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
@ 2001-12-31 19:40 Jason Molenda
2001-02-07 17:24 ` Jason Molenda
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
I was curious what percentage of people were avoiding the RBL checks
by being subscribed.
Since January 1st, rbl-check.sh has consulted the actual RBLs 10,127
times. It has skipped these RBL checks 5,883 times because people
were subscribed. Of the 10,127 RBL checks, 9,672 times the messages
were let through. (the remainder were rejected because the sending
site was listed in the RBLs)
Of course, this doesn't tell the whole story - a small number of
people make up much of those 10,127 RBL checks. The top 20:
1204 anonymous@sourceware.cygnus.com
472 aoliva@redhat.com
324 tromey@creche.cygnus.com
265 mitchell@codesourcery.com
166 bryce@albatross.co.nz
163 pedwards@disaster.jaj.com
159 law@upchuck.cygnus.com
144 jsm28@srcf.ucam.org
139 drepper@redhat.com
135 ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu
130 jlarmour@redhat.com
127 dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca
120 nickc@redhat.com
105 jason@redhat.com
103 kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu
103 cwilson@ece.gatech.edu
93 corinna@vinschen.de
89 cgf@redhat.com
86 hubicka@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
74 bernds@redhat.com
Or about 4,201 of those checks in all. So if you exclude these
folks, the RBL checks have been made unnecessary for about 50% of
all senders.
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
2001-12-31 19:40 Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker Jason Molenda
2001-02-07 17:24 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Alexandre Oliva
@ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2001-02-07 17:28 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
Oh BTW the breakdown on which RBLs were giving the positive
identifications. since Jan 1, they are
273 RSS
41 MAPS DUL
25 ORBS
5 MAPS RBL
It might be interesting to flag in rbl-check.sh which of the ORBS
lists a site is listed in.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
2001-12-31 19:40 Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker Jason Molenda
2001-02-07 17:24 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-02-08 13:12 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: overseers
On Feb 7, 2001, Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com> wrote:
> I was curious what percentage of people were avoiding the RBL checks
> by being subscribed.
> 1204 anonymous@sourceware.cygnus.com
> 472 aoliva@redhat.com
Sorry about all the SPAM :-)
Now, on to figure out who this anonymous@ user is, and terminate
him/her, so that I can claim the prize :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-02-08 13:12 ` Alexandre Oliva
@ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2001-02-08 13:50 ` Jason Molenda
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Oliva; +Cc: overseers
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:11:45PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > 1204 anonymous@sourceware.cygnus.com
> > 472 aoliva@redhat.com
>
> Sorry about all the SPAM :-)
>
> Now, on to figure out who this anonymous@ user is, and terminate
> him/her, so that I can claim the prize :-)
:) This is probably the gnats mail notes or something like that.
cvs messages go through a separate script (local-mail-only.sh).
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker...
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2001-02-07 17:56 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-07 17:58 ` Christopher Faylor
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer, overseers
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 05:55:31PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>> Intuitively (and according to my experience), if you switch RSS and ORBS,
>> you'd get a symmetric result, right?
>
>I haven't looked in a long time, but it used to be like that. I
>don't know if it's still true.
When I was playing with things last weekend, I found some situations where
ORBS blocked things that RSS didn't but not vice versa.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-31 19:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-12-31 19:40 Speaking of cgf's enhancement to the rbl checker Jason Molenda
2001-02-07 17:24 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-02-08 13:12 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2001-02-08 13:50 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2001-02-07 17:28 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-02-07 17:47 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2001-02-07 17:56 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-07 17:58 ` Christopher Faylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).