From: Jeffrey A Law <law@redhat.com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: cgf@redhat.com, overseers@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC maintainer account
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6358.982339099@slagheap.cygnus.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20010216075600.K2xi56RfKEk2G0IguSj_0LF5FHqw4EfvWvBahCOCONU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010215192723I.mitchell@codesourcery.com>
In message < 20010215192723I.mitchell@codesourcery.com >you write:
> >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> writes:
>
> Chris> I've set this account up but this could possibly be
> Chris> retroactively vetoed by the other overseers if they see
> Chris> this as a security risk.
>
> Understood. If necessary, we can go to a compromise situation where
> only, say, steering committee members have accesss. In fact, if you
> prefer that, you could go ahead and make that change now.
I think the best thing to do will be to add keys for GCC folks to that
account on an as-needed basis.
It's certainly a step forward from having so much stuff rely on personal
accounts (like mine).
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-16 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-31 19:40 Mark Mitchell
2001-02-15 18:19 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-15 18:31 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-02-15 18:42 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Chris Faylor
2001-02-15 19:10 ` Chris Faylor
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-17 10:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-17 15:23 ` Phil Edwards
2001-02-17 22:25 ` Jeffrey A Law
2001-02-18 13:40 ` several messages Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-31 19:40 ` GCC maintainer account Mark Mitchell
2001-02-17 12:10 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-02-17 17:12 ` Chris Faylor
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Tom Tromey
2001-02-17 15:51 ` Tom Tromey
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-20 8:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-20 11:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2001-02-15 20:51 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-02-15 21:17 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-15 21:56 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-02-16 0:47 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-16 9:09 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Phil Edwards
2001-02-16 10:17 ` Phil Edwards
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-02-16 11:24 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-02-16 8:30 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-02-15 19:24 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Chris Faylor
2001-02-15 19:41 ` Chris Faylor
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Chris Faylor
2001-02-15 19:52 ` Chris Faylor
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-02-15 20:05 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Alexandre Petit-Bianco
2001-02-15 19:33 ` Alexandre Petit-Bianco
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-02-15 19:21 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law [this message]
2001-02-16 7:56 ` Jeffrey A Law
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-16 6:18 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6358.982339099@slagheap.cygnus.com \
--to=law@redhat.com \
--cc=cgf@redhat.com \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=overseers@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).