Re: two gccadmin requests

[Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>]

One of the reasons that we set up gccadmin was so that GCC administrators
could handle this kind of thing themselves.

AFAICT, there is no need to get overseers involved with this request, is
there?  While jsm is reminding you of this, he could also be able to set
you up with gccadmin privileges by adding your key to
.ssh/authorized_keys.

cgf

On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 07:22:14PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
>jsm kindly reminded me that the v3 web docs and the 2.95.2 html manual
>were being generated from scripts in my sourceware account, and prodded
>my lazy butt into moving them into gccadmin / maintainer-scripts.
>
>Could someone either add my ssh key to gccadmin's account, or contact me
>privately with an email volunteering to do a chunkload of file copying?  :-)
>
>Also, some advice requested:
>
>    1)  Rather than trying to merge update_web_docs and my script for
>    libstdc++-v3, I'd rather just add my script to that directory, and
>    have the main one call it.  There are some major differences in how
>    the docs are handled; the two scripts don't have much in common to
>    suggest merging (at least not right now).
>
>    2)  The manual for 2.95.x doesn't change ever, much less on a nightly
>    basis.  Rather than regenerating the HTML once a month (for the cleanout
>    on the 15th), can I just keep a .tar.bz2 of the manual in ~gccadmin,
>    and unzip it after the cleanout?