From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Faylor To: Jason Molenda , Hans-Peter Nilsson , overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: DB2 problem...: PANIC: No space left on device Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 19:40:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010328203404.A4175@redhat.com> References: <20010326020455.A7844@shell17.ba.best.com> <20010328190840.B3389@redhat.com> <20010328162302.A25518@shell17.ba.best.com> <20010328194054.C3538@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001/msg00513.html On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 07:40:54PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 04:23:02PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote: >>On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 07:08:40PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>> I don't remember discussing /dev/hda4. It is a 15GB partition. Do we >>> really need that much space? Will it help to have that much space or will >>> the above change be sufficient? >> >> http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/overseers/2001-q1/msg00480.html >> >> http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/overseers/2001-q1/msg00482.html >> >>/sourceware/htdig has 6GB, which is waaaay too small for both sourceware and >>gcc databases. 6GB will be too small for _one_ of them within the next year. >>15GB may not be necessary for the gcc DB, but I'd give it at least 10GB so >>this doesn't need to be fiddled with again any time soon. > >Ok. I remember now. I've started the transfer to the larger partition. I >hope to be done shortly. It's done. One thing that I noticed is that it doesn't look like we're using the maxium throughput settings for this drive. Would it make sense to twiddle some of the parameters with hdparm or is that just too dangerous? cgf From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Faylor To: Jason Molenda , Hans-Peter Nilsson , overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: DB2 problem...: PANIC: No space left on device Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20010328203404.A4175@redhat.com> References: <20010326020455.A7844@shell17.ba.best.com> <20010328190840.B3389@redhat.com> <20010328162302.A25518@shell17.ba.best.com> <20010328194054.C3538@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg00513.html Message-ID: <20010328173300.U3oC_JYvd9G1NQYnMQNHnx-2TcFXcW94-b6FX2HiFw0@z> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 07:40:54PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 04:23:02PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote: >>On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 07:08:40PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>> I don't remember discussing /dev/hda4. It is a 15GB partition. Do we >>> really need that much space? Will it help to have that much space or will >>> the above change be sufficient? >> >> http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/overseers/2001-q1/msg00480.html >> >> http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/overseers/2001-q1/msg00482.html >> >>/sourceware/htdig has 6GB, which is waaaay too small for both sourceware and >>gcc databases. 6GB will be too small for _one_ of them within the next year. >>15GB may not be necessary for the gcc DB, but I'd give it at least 10GB so >>this doesn't need to be fiddled with again any time soon. > >Ok. I remember now. I've started the transfer to the larger partition. I >hope to be done shortly. It's done. One thing that I noticed is that it doesn't look like we're using the maxium throughput settings for this drive. Would it make sense to twiddle some of the parameters with hdparm or is that just too dangerous? cgf