public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: Jason Molenda <jason@molenda.com>
Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: hard disk fun == down time
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 19:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010329235720.A11045@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010329203236.A2834@shell17.ba.best.com>

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 08:32:36PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:27:37PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>The end result was that when I wrote to /dev/hda4, I was also randomly
>>writing to /dev/hda3.
>
>Ouch! It wasn't just a partition problem where they were overlapping or
>something like that?  I've seen that happen before, where you write to
>one of the partitions and you're scrubbing all over one of the other
>ones in the process.

Nah.  I'm pretty sure it was a linux problem.  I had the same problem
here (at home).  I spent a week staring at partition tables and then
one day I decided to upgrade the OS.  The problem just disappeared.

Both Jeff and I looked at the partition table and it looked fine,
AFAWCT.

>If that 9GB SCSI drive is still around, the vast majority of the
>web site is static.  99% of all the web pages on the site are
>mailing lists, and only a small fraction of those web archives have
>changed since the drive swap (i.e. the current month/quarter/year
>archives).  All of the other archives could be copied back from the
>SCSI drive on top of whatever's there now.

Yep.  That's what we plan on doing.  I think the old SCSI disk is more
recent than any of the tape backups of that disk.

Btw, I've just learned that /dev/hda1 was affected too.  Sigh.

cgf

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: Jason Molenda <jason@molenda.com>
Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: hard disk fun == down time
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 20:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010329235720.A11045@redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20010329205600.asHKwnEDQFiyWSOjfIy_tiHWzqrcXQclakaGCGmc3G4@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010329203236.A2834@shell17.ba.best.com>

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 08:32:36PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:27:37PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>The end result was that when I wrote to /dev/hda4, I was also randomly
>>writing to /dev/hda3.
>
>Ouch! It wasn't just a partition problem where they were overlapping or
>something like that?  I've seen that happen before, where you write to
>one of the partitions and you're scrubbing all over one of the other
>ones in the process.

Nah.  I'm pretty sure it was a linux problem.  I had the same problem
here (at home).  I spent a week staring at partition tables and then
one day I decided to upgrade the OS.  The problem just disappeared.

Both Jeff and I looked at the partition table and it looked fine,
AFAWCT.

>If that 9GB SCSI drive is still around, the vast majority of the
>web site is static.  99% of all the web pages on the site are
>mailing lists, and only a small fraction of those web archives have
>changed since the drive swap (i.e. the current month/quarter/year
>archives).  All of the other archives could be copied back from the
>SCSI drive on top of whatever's there now.

Yep.  That's what we plan on doing.  I think the old SCSI disk is more
recent than any of the tape backups of that disk.

Btw, I've just learned that /dev/hda1 was affected too.  Sigh.

cgf

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-12-31 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-31 19:40 Christopher Faylor
2001-03-29 18:31 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda
2001-03-29 20:34   ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40   ` law
2001-04-01 20:46     ` law
2001-12-31 19:40   ` Christopher Faylor [this message]
2001-03-29 20:56     ` Christopher Faylor
2001-12-31 19:40   ` Jason Molenda
2001-03-29 21:06     ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-31 19:40     ` Christopher Faylor
2001-03-29 22:14       ` Christopher Faylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010329235720.A11045@redhat.com \
    --to=cgf@redhat.com \
    --cc=jason@molenda.com \
    --cc=overseers@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).