* Re: I may twiddle with mhonarc this weekend [not found] <20011109092435.A14309@shell17.ba.best.com> @ 2001-10-01 9:33 ` Jason Molenda 2001-10-01 9:36 ` Andrew Cagney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-10-01 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: overseers Done. The system is now running mhonarc 2.5.0. I did not get it to put HTML messages in separate files. The new version does defang HTML a bit better than before, and I configured it to strip out <FONT> tags so people can't annoy me as effectively with their ugly HTML. It will now put text/plain attachments in separate files. If someone includes a patch in the text of their message, that'll still be inlined in the main HTML page, of course, but if they attach the patch it'll be handled correctly. I've been watching the system closely since I upgraded it and I haven't seen any problems. Jason PS- For my next trick, while falling asleep last night I thought of how to do something neat. I'll leave it as a surprise for now. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: I may twiddle with mhonarc this weekend 2001-10-01 9:33 ` I may twiddle with mhonarc this weekend Jason Molenda @ 2001-10-01 9:36 ` Andrew Cagney 2001-10-01 9:47 ` Jason Molenda 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2001-10-01 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: overseers > Done. > > The system is now running mhonarc 2.5.0. > > I did not get it to put HTML messages in separate files. The new > version does defang HTML a bit better than before, and I configured > it to strip out <FONT> tags so people can't annoy me as effectively > with their ugly HTML. > > It will now put text/plain attachments in separate files. If someone > includes a patch in the text of their message, that'll still be > inlined in the main HTML page, of course, but if they attach the patch > it'll be handled correctly. It wouldn't be possible to do both? Display the attachment inline but have it available as a link. Half the time you're looking through the archives to just see what a patch did, the other half you want to extract the patch :-( I guess it is a loose, loose situtation. Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: I may twiddle with mhonarc this weekend 2001-10-01 9:36 ` Andrew Cagney @ 2001-10-01 9:47 ` Jason Molenda 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-10-01 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: overseers On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 01:00:59PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > It will now put text/plain attachments in separate files. If someone > > includes a patch in the text of their message, that'll still be > > inlined in the main HTML page, of course, but if they attach the patch > > it'll be handled correctly. > > It wouldn't be possible to do both? Display the attachment inline but > have it available as a link. (no) > Half the time you're looking through the > archives to just see what a patch did, the other half you want to > extract the patch :-( Maybe I didn't describe this well. You can see an example here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/test-list/2001/msg00028.html If you're browsing the archives, you can see the patch by clicking on the attachment. So there's an extra click involved, but I don't think this is much of an inconvenience.. Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-11-11 18:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20011109092435.A14309@shell17.ba.best.com>
2001-10-01 9:33 ` I may twiddle with mhonarc this weekend Jason Molenda
2001-10-01 9:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-10-01 9:47 ` Jason Molenda
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).