public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: Jason Molenda <jason@molenda.com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>, overseers@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 16:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011122011111.GA23845@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011121220528.A1135@molenda.com>

On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 10:05:28PM +0000, Jason Molenda wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 01:46:40PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> I noticed that the domain name sourceware.org was available.  
>
>Sweet!  I've been meaning to look at the status of Sourceware for
>a little while now.  Back in '98 or '99 there was some l0zers who'd
>purchased the trademark rights are were telling us to stop using
>the name (which I essentially ignored :-) - I'm positive their
>company doesn't exist any longer.  It sounded implausible even in
>the silly high-times of 1999-2000.
>
>The whois record for sourceware.com shows the owner bought it for
>five years.  Boo!  It looks like a single person doing some side
>work out of his home.

AFAICT, it looks like the current trademark owner is different from the
sourceware.com and sourceware.net domain name owners.

So, I'm not worried either.

Should we start referring to the system as sourceware.org?  I tend to
call the system sourcew, er, sources, anyway.

cgf
Cyg, er, Red Hat, Inc.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: Jason Molenda <jason@molenda.com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>, overseers@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011122011111.GA23845@redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20011121171100.hvUKP4fJEcnMxbPllAih9qe8uSRhVdWsnrUxnfkiN8I@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011121220528.A1135@molenda.com>

On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 10:05:28PM +0000, Jason Molenda wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 01:46:40PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> I noticed that the domain name sourceware.org was available.  
>
>Sweet!  I've been meaning to look at the status of Sourceware for
>a little while now.  Back in '98 or '99 there was some l0zers who'd
>purchased the trademark rights are were telling us to stop using
>the name (which I essentially ignored :-) - I'm positive their
>company doesn't exist any longer.  It sounded implausible even in
>the silly high-times of 1999-2000.
>
>The whois record for sourceware.com shows the owner bought it for
>five years.  Boo!  It looks like a single person doing some side
>work out of his home.

AFAICT, it looks like the current trademark owner is different from the
sourceware.com and sourceware.net domain name owners.

So, I'm not worried either.

Should we start referring to the system as sourceware.org?  I tend to
call the system sourcew, er, sources, anyway.

cgf
Cyg, er, Red Hat, Inc.

  reply	other threads:[~2001-11-22  1:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-22 17:15 sourceware.org Ian Lance Taylor
2001-10-23 18:19 ` sourceware.org Jason Molenda
2001-10-25 16:39   ` Christopher Faylor [this message]
2001-11-21 17:11     ` sourceware.org Christopher Faylor
2001-11-21 14:05   ` sourceware.org Jason Molenda
2001-10-23 19:37 ` sourceware.org Per Bothner
2001-10-24  8:32   ` sourceware.org Ian Lance Taylor
2001-11-21 14:45     ` sourceware.org Ian Lance Taylor
2001-11-21 14:20   ` sourceware.org Per Bothner
2001-11-21 13:46 ` sourceware.org Ian Lance Taylor
2003-03-04 15:41 sourceware.org Jonathan Larmour
2003-03-05  2:52 ` sourceware.org Christopher Faylor
2003-03-05  6:42   ` sourceware.org Jason Molenda
2003-03-05  7:14     ` sourceware.org Phil Edwards

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011122011111.GA23845@redhat.com \
    --to=cgf@redhat.com \
    --cc=ian@airs.com \
    --cc=jason@molenda.com \
    --cc=overseers@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).