* [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
@ 2001-11-08 9:25 Christopher Faylor
2001-11-08 11:10 ` Jason Molenda
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-11-08 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
This has probably been discussed before, but is there any way to avoid
the problem described below? It is annoying to have to login before
viewing a PR.
It would be nice if you were just logged into guest automatically.
cgf
----- Forwarded message from Adam Schrotenboer <adam@tabris.net> -----
From: Adam Schrotenboer <adam@tabris.net>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: GNATS Login was Re: Linux Kernel, KDE & GCC 3.0.3
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 21:26:41 -0500
Organization: Dome-S-Isle Data
In-Reply-To: <20011214105513.A5977@mediaone.net>
Something that has been getting on my nerves is that it is impossible to (at
least thru a direct link) read a PR w/o having a GNATS login.
Any plans to make the GNATS db available for public access?
On Friday 14 December 2001 10:55, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 02:10:32AM -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
> > Have the KDE issues been resolved in 3.0.3? also, what of the Kernel 2.4
> > 8139too.c ICE?
>
> The 8139too.c ICE should be fixed:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=4529&database=gcc
>
> I'm not sure about the GLIBC and KDE issues.
--
tabris
Courage is resistance of fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear.
----- End forwarded message -----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 9:25 [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login] Christopher Faylor
@ 2001-11-08 11:10 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-08 14:22 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-12-14 19:45 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-08 22:08 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-14 19:32 ` Christopher Faylor
2 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-11-08 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:31:28PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> This has probably been discussed before, but is there any way to avoid
> the problem described below? It is annoying to have to login before
> viewing a PR.
I'm not sure what his complaint is... of course anyone can view the
PRs by using the guest/guest login which is documented on the login page.
In fact, any arbitrary name/password will give you read-only access
unless someone has changed the configurations since I set them up.
If you've logged in, doesn't gnatsweb store the login info in a
cookie, and subsequent accesses get the name/password out of the cookie?
I agree that it'd be sweet if gnatsweb could assume a guest/guest login
if no gnatsweb cookie is presented (and people would have to click on a
'login' button to log in with a write-access acct), but I don't see the
current situation as especially unbearable. Maybe this user has cookies
disabled.
Disclaimer - I haven't looked at gnatsweb in at least a year. I don't
think this core behavior has changed since I last looked, but it's possible.
J
>
> It would be nice if you were just logged into guest automatically.
>
> cgf
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Adam Schrotenboer <adam@tabris.net> -----
>
> From: Adam Schrotenboer <adam@tabris.net>
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: GNATS Login was Re: Linux Kernel, KDE & GCC 3.0.3
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 21:26:41 -0500
> Organization: Dome-S-Isle Data
> In-Reply-To: <20011214105513.A5977@mediaone.net>
>
> Something that has been getting on my nerves is that it is impossible to (at
> least thru a direct link) read a PR w/o having a GNATS login.
>
> Any plans to make the GNATS db available for public access?
>
> On Friday 14 December 2001 10:55, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 02:10:32AM -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
> > > Have the KDE issues been resolved in 3.0.3? also, what of the Kernel 2.4
> > > 8139too.c ICE?
> >
> > The 8139too.c ICE should be fixed:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=4529&database=gcc
> >
> > I'm not sure about the GLIBC and KDE issues.
>
> --
> tabris
> Courage is resistance of fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear.
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 11:10 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-11-08 14:22 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-08 20:03 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-14 19:56 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-12-14 19:45 ` Jason Molenda
1 sibling, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-11-08 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 07:44:15PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:31:28PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>This has probably been discussed before, but is there any way to avoid
>>the problem described below? It is annoying to have to login before
>>viewing a PR.
>
>I'm not sure what his complaint is... of course anyone can view the
>PRs by using the guest/guest login which is documented on the login
>page. In fact, any arbitrary name/password will give you read-only
>access unless someone has changed the configurations since I set them
>up.
He's complaining that he has to *first* login and *then* view the page.
He can't just click on the URL and have the page displayed automatically.
>If you've logged in, doesn't gnatsweb store the login info in a cookie,
>and subsequent accesses get the name/password out of the cookie?
>
>I agree that it'd be sweet if gnatsweb could assume a guest/guest login
>if no gnatsweb cookie is presented (and people would have to click on a
>'login' button to log in with a write-access acct), but I don't see the
>current situation as especially unbearable. Maybe this user has
>cookies disabled.
No one said it was unbearable. It just isn't user friendly. I just
tried this with a browser where I hadn't logged into gnats and got a
login screen rather than the bug. It's obvious what needs to be done at
this point. It's not obvious why we require it. That's all.
I was just asking if it was possible to have things changed so that the
default was to login as guest, which would bypass this minor problem.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 14:22 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2001-11-08 20:03 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-08 20:16 ` Jason Molenda
` (2 more replies)
2001-12-14 19:56 ` Christopher Faylor
1 sibling, 3 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-11-08 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:55:22PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> I was just asking if it was possible to have things changed so that the
> default was to login as guest, which would bypass this minor problem.
>
My bad, I didn't get it.
gnatsweb doesn't do this right now, but I doubt it would be especially
difficult to hack it to assume a guest/guest login if no cookie is
presented. Doesn't using gnats require the use of cookies? A
change like this might make it usable for cookie-adverse people, at
least for read-only ooperations.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 20:03 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-11-08 20:16 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-14 20:11 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-09 2:36 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-14 20:09 ` Jason Molenda
2 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-11-08 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 08:08:37PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
> gnatsweb doesn't do this right now, but I doubt it would be especially
> difficult to hack it to assume a guest/guest login if no cookie is
> presented. Doesn't using gnats require the use of cookies? A
> change like this might make it usable for cookie-adverse people, at
> least for read-only ooperations.
>
Some thought would have to be given to how a person with write access can
log in. Maybe if someone goes specifically to the login screen, we'd not
force a guest/guest cookie on them. Not insurmountable, but it's one more
small complication that'd have to be considered.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 20:16 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-12-14 20:11 ` Jason Molenda
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-12-14 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 08:08:37PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
> gnatsweb doesn't do this right now, but I doubt it would be especially
> difficult to hack it to assume a guest/guest login if no cookie is
> presented. Doesn't using gnats require the use of cookies? A
> change like this might make it usable for cookie-adverse people, at
> least for read-only ooperations.
>
Some thought would have to be given to how a person with write access can
log in. Maybe if someone goes specifically to the login screen, we'd not
force a guest/guest cookie on them. Not insurmountable, but it's one more
small complication that'd have to be considered.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 20:03 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-08 20:16 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-11-09 2:36 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-09 8:30 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-14 21:59 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-14 20:09 ` Jason Molenda
2 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-11-09 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 732 bytes --]
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 08:08:37PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
> gnatsweb doesn't do this right now, but I doubt it would be especially
> difficult to hack it to assume a guest/guest login if no cookie is
> presented.
It wasn't. I only tested this a little bit, but I bet you could
get away with this patch. I didn't look at the sourceware case
where the database is not predetermined -- I think it would still
work as long as the database= line is included in the URL, but I
haven't really thought about this.
Incidentally, everything works OK without cookies as long as you're
satisfied with read-only access.
I haven't applied this to the gcc gnatsweb, I don't want to mess
with other people's stuff in this case.
Jason
[-- Attachment #2: pa.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 973 bytes --]
--- gnatsweb.pl Fri Dec 14 12:02:52 2001
+++ gnatswebber.pl Fri Dec 14 21:45:49 2001
@@ -3569,12 +3569,18 @@ sub main
elsif(!$global_prefs{'database'}
|| !$db_prefs{'user'} || !$db_prefs{'password'})
{
- # We don't have username/password/database; give login page then
- # redirect to the url they really want (self_url).
- login_page($q->self_url());
- exit();
+ #GCC-LOCAL begin: No cookie? They're a read-only guest/guest.
+ $global_prefs{'database'} = "gcc";
+ $db_prefs{'user'} = "guest";
+ $db_prefs{'password'} = "guest";
+
+# # We don't have username/password/database; give login page then
+# # redirect to the url they really want (self_url).
+# login_page($q->self_url());
+# exit();
}
- elsif($cmd eq 'submit')
+ if($cmd eq 'submit')
+ #GCC-LOCAL end.
{
# User is submitting a new PR. Store cookie because email address may
# have changed. This facilitates entering bugs the next time.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-09 2:36 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-11-09 8:30 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-15 2:12 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-14 21:59 ` Jason Molenda
1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2001-11-09 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: overseers
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Jason Molenda wrote:
> I haven't applied this to the gcc gnatsweb, I don't want to mess
> with other people's stuff in this case.
Don't hesitate to mess^Wtoy around with this. ;-)
(My GCC time budget has been seriously limited lately, and your help
is certainly most welcome!)
Gerald
--
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-09 2:36 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-09 8:30 ` Gerald Pfeifer
@ 2001-12-14 21:59 ` Jason Molenda
1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-12-14 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 08:08:37PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
> gnatsweb doesn't do this right now, but I doubt it would be especially
> difficult to hack it to assume a guest/guest login if no cookie is
> presented.
It wasn't. I only tested this a little bit, but I bet you could
get away with this patch. I didn't look at the sourceware case
where the database is not predetermined -- I think it would still
work as long as the database= line is included in the URL, but I
haven't really thought about this.
Incidentally, everything works OK without cookies as long as you're
satisfied with read-only access.
I haven't applied this to the gcc gnatsweb, I don't want to mess
with other people's stuff in this case.
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 20:03 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-08 20:16 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-09 2:36 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-12-14 20:09 ` Jason Molenda
2 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-12-14 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:55:22PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> I was just asking if it was possible to have things changed so that the
> default was to login as guest, which would bypass this minor problem.
>
My bad, I didn't get it.
gnatsweb doesn't do this right now, but I doubt it would be especially
difficult to hack it to assume a guest/guest login if no cookie is
presented. Doesn't using gnats require the use of cookies? A
change like this might make it usable for cookie-adverse people, at
least for read-only ooperations.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 14:22 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-08 20:03 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-12-14 19:56 ` Christopher Faylor
1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-12-14 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 07:44:15PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:31:28PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>This has probably been discussed before, but is there any way to avoid
>>the problem described below? It is annoying to have to login before
>>viewing a PR.
>
>I'm not sure what his complaint is... of course anyone can view the
>PRs by using the guest/guest login which is documented on the login
>page. In fact, any arbitrary name/password will give you read-only
>access unless someone has changed the configurations since I set them
>up.
He's complaining that he has to *first* login and *then* view the page.
He can't just click on the URL and have the page displayed automatically.
>If you've logged in, doesn't gnatsweb store the login info in a cookie,
>and subsequent accesses get the name/password out of the cookie?
>
>I agree that it'd be sweet if gnatsweb could assume a guest/guest login
>if no gnatsweb cookie is presented (and people would have to click on a
>'login' button to log in with a write-access acct), but I don't see the
>current situation as especially unbearable. Maybe this user has
>cookies disabled.
No one said it was unbearable. It just isn't user friendly. I just
tried this with a browser where I hadn't logged into gnats and got a
login screen rather than the bug. It's obvious what needs to be done at
this point. It's not obvious why we require it. That's all.
I was just asking if it was possible to have things changed so that the
default was to login as guest, which would bypass this minor problem.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 11:10 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-08 14:22 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2001-12-14 19:45 ` Jason Molenda
1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-12-14 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:31:28PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> This has probably been discussed before, but is there any way to avoid
> the problem described below? It is annoying to have to login before
> viewing a PR.
I'm not sure what his complaint is... of course anyone can view the
PRs by using the guest/guest login which is documented on the login page.
In fact, any arbitrary name/password will give you read-only access
unless someone has changed the configurations since I set them up.
If you've logged in, doesn't gnatsweb store the login info in a
cookie, and subsequent accesses get the name/password out of the cookie?
I agree that it'd be sweet if gnatsweb could assume a guest/guest login
if no gnatsweb cookie is presented (and people would have to click on a
'login' button to log in with a write-access acct), but I don't see the
current situation as especially unbearable. Maybe this user has cookies
disabled.
Disclaimer - I haven't looked at gnatsweb in at least a year. I don't
think this core behavior has changed since I last looked, but it's possible.
J
>
> It would be nice if you were just logged into guest automatically.
>
> cgf
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Adam Schrotenboer <adam@tabris.net> -----
>
> From: Adam Schrotenboer <adam@tabris.net>
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: GNATS Login was Re: Linux Kernel, KDE & GCC 3.0.3
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 21:26:41 -0500
> Organization: Dome-S-Isle Data
> In-Reply-To: <20011214105513.A5977@mediaone.net>
>
> Something that has been getting on my nerves is that it is impossible to (at
> least thru a direct link) read a PR w/o having a GNATS login.
>
> Any plans to make the GNATS db available for public access?
>
> On Friday 14 December 2001 10:55, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 02:10:32AM -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
> > > Have the KDE issues been resolved in 3.0.3? also, what of the Kernel 2.4
> > > 8139too.c ICE?
> >
> > The 8139too.c ICE should be fixed:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=4529&database=gcc
> >
> > I'm not sure about the GLIBC and KDE issues.
>
> --
> tabris
> Courage is resistance of fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear.
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 9:25 [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login] Christopher Faylor
2001-11-08 11:10 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-11-08 22:08 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-08 22:36 ` Christopher Faylor
` (2 more replies)
2001-12-14 19:32 ` Christopher Faylor
2 siblings, 3 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-11-08 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:31:28PM -0500, Christopher Faylor quoted someone:
>
> Something that has been getting on my nerves is that it is impossible to (at
> least thru a direct link) read a PR w/o having a GNATS login.
>
I think this person's real complaint is that the gcc gnatsweb page is
not saying "log in as guest/guest to get guest access" - it probably got
dropped with Gerald's latest gnatsweb update.
I agree with the points you were making about how it should behave, but
I think this complaint is a more basic one; it appears that you need
an account to view the PRs.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 22:08 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-11-08 22:36 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-12-14 21:33 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-09 7:33 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-14 21:30 ` Jason Molenda
2 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-11-08 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: overseers, Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:28:48PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:31:28PM -0500, Christopher Faylor quoted someone:
>> Something that has been getting on my nerves is that it is impossible to (at
>> least thru a direct link) read a PR w/o having a GNATS login.
>>
>
>I think this person's real complaint is that the gcc gnatsweb page is
>not saying "log in as guest/guest to get guest access" - it probably got
>dropped with Gerald's latest gnatsweb update.
>
>I agree with the points you were making about how it should behave, but
>I think this complaint is a more basic one; it appears that you need
>an account to view the PRs.
Ah. You're probably right. I just assumed that it would be obvious that
you should login as guest but my assumption is based on past experience
rather than any on-screen clues.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 22:36 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2001-12-14 21:33 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-12-14 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: overseers, Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:28:48PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:31:28PM -0500, Christopher Faylor quoted someone:
>> Something that has been getting on my nerves is that it is impossible to (at
>> least thru a direct link) read a PR w/o having a GNATS login.
>>
>
>I think this person's real complaint is that the gcc gnatsweb page is
>not saying "log in as guest/guest to get guest access" - it probably got
>dropped with Gerald's latest gnatsweb update.
>
>I agree with the points you were making about how it should behave, but
>I think this complaint is a more basic one; it appears that you need
>an account to view the PRs.
Ah. You're probably right. I just assumed that it would be obvious that
you should login as guest but my assumption is based on past experience
rather than any on-screen clues.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 22:08 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-08 22:36 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2001-11-09 7:33 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-15 2:01 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-14 21:30 ` Jason Molenda
2 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2001-11-09 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: overseers
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Jason Molenda wrote:
> I think this person's real complaint is that the gcc gnatsweb page is
> not saying "log in as guest/guest to get guest access" - it probably got
> dropped with Gerald's latest gnatsweb update.
It seems we lost this quite a bit earlier (probably as part of some
earlier gnatsweb merger). :(
I just committed this patch to at least prominently mention the guest
login.
Gerald
Index: gnatsweb.pl
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl,v
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -3 -p -r1.44 gnatsweb.pl
--- gnatsweb.pl 2001/12/14 20:02:50 1.44
+++ gnatsweb.pl 2001/12/15 09:55:40
@@ -3340,6 +3340,10 @@ sub login_page
# Print the login form.
print $q->start_form(),
+ #GCC-LOCAL begin.
+ "<p>Use username `<em>guest</em>' and password `<em>guest</em>' ",
+ "for read-only and bug reporting access.</p>",
+ #GCC-LOCAL end.
"<table>",
"<tr>\n<td>User Name:</td>\n<td>",
$q->textfield(-name=>'user',
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-09 7:33 ` Gerald Pfeifer
@ 2001-12-15 2:01 ` Gerald Pfeifer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2001-12-15 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: overseers
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Jason Molenda wrote:
> I think this person's real complaint is that the gcc gnatsweb page is
> not saying "log in as guest/guest to get guest access" - it probably got
> dropped with Gerald's latest gnatsweb update.
It seems we lost this quite a bit earlier (probably as part of some
earlier gnatsweb merger). :(
I just committed this patch to at least prominently mention the guest
login.
Gerald
Index: gnatsweb.pl
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl,v
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -3 -p -r1.44 gnatsweb.pl
--- gnatsweb.pl 2001/12/14 20:02:50 1.44
+++ gnatsweb.pl 2001/12/15 09:55:40
@@ -3340,6 +3340,10 @@ sub login_page
# Print the login form.
print $q->start_form(),
+ #GCC-LOCAL begin.
+ "<p>Use username `<em>guest</em>' and password `<em>guest</em>' ",
+ "for read-only and bug reporting access.</p>",
+ #GCC-LOCAL end.
"<table>",
"<tr>\n<td>User Name:</td>\n<td>",
$q->textfield(-name=>'user',
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 22:08 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-08 22:36 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-09 7:33 ` Gerald Pfeifer
@ 2001-12-14 21:30 ` Jason Molenda
2 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-12-14 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:31:28PM -0500, Christopher Faylor quoted someone:
>
> Something that has been getting on my nerves is that it is impossible to (at
> least thru a direct link) read a PR w/o having a GNATS login.
>
I think this person's real complaint is that the gcc gnatsweb page is
not saying "log in as guest/guest to get guest access" - it probably got
dropped with Gerald's latest gnatsweb update.
I agree with the points you were making about how it should behave, but
I think this complaint is a more basic one; it appears that you need
an account to view the PRs.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login]
2001-11-08 9:25 [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login] Christopher Faylor
2001-11-08 11:10 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-08 22:08 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2001-12-14 19:32 ` Christopher Faylor
2 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-12-14 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
This has probably been discussed before, but is there any way to avoid
the problem described below? It is annoying to have to login before
viewing a PR.
It would be nice if you were just logged into guest automatically.
cgf
----- Forwarded message from Adam Schrotenboer <adam@tabris.net> -----
From: Adam Schrotenboer <adam@tabris.net>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: GNATS Login was Re: Linux Kernel, KDE & GCC 3.0.3
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 21:26:41 -0500
Organization: Dome-S-Isle Data
In-Reply-To: <20011214105513.A5977@mediaone.net>
Something that has been getting on my nerves is that it is impossible to (at
least thru a direct link) read a PR w/o having a GNATS login.
Any plans to make the GNATS db available for public access?
On Friday 14 December 2001 10:55, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 02:10:32AM -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
> > Have the KDE issues been resolved in 3.0.3? also, what of the Kernel 2.4
> > 8139too.c ICE?
>
> The 8139too.c ICE should be fixed:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=4529&database=gcc
>
> I'm not sure about the GLIBC and KDE issues.
--
tabris
Courage is resistance of fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear.
----- End forwarded message -----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-15 10:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-11-08 9:25 [adam@tabris.net: GNATS Login] Christopher Faylor
2001-11-08 11:10 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-08 14:22 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-08 20:03 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-08 20:16 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-14 20:11 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-09 2:36 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-09 8:30 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-15 2:12 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-14 21:59 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-14 20:09 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-14 19:56 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-12-14 19:45 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-08 22:08 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-08 22:36 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-12-14 21:33 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-11-09 7:33 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-15 2:01 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2001-12-14 21:30 ` Jason Molenda
2001-12-14 19:32 ` Christopher Faylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).