From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31864 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2002 21:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31820 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2002 21:36:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.225) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Nov 2002 21:36:00 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 0EEF11BF36; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:36:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:36:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Roland McGrath Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [MAILER-DAEMON@sources.redhat.com: failure notice] Message-ID: <20021119213600.GA25278@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Roland McGrath , overseers@sources.redhat.com References: <200211192038.gAJKcrl11845@magilla.sf.frob.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200211192038.gAJKcrl11845@magilla.sf.frob.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-q4/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 12:38:53PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: Content-Description: message body text >Hey there. AFAICT this spam detector is buggy because it doesn't notice >more than one CC: header. Maybe that's not RFC822 (I dunno off hand), but >folks sure do it. Yep, they do. This is now fixed. I hope. Thanks, cgf