From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 11384 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2003 05:17:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 11 Jan 2003 05:17:33 -0000 Received: from roscoe.constant.com (tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 514E2800041; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 00:17:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 05:17:00 -0000 From: Benjamin Kosnik To: Christopher Faylor Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Bouncing services to the new machine? Message-Id: <20030110231554.278f751f.bkoz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20030110185839.GA28398@redhat.com> References: <20030110185839.GA28398@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:58:39 -0500 Christopher Faylor wrote: >I could redirect mail, ftp, and http, I think. non-anon-cvs would be >problematic since it relies on ssh. What would you say to redirecting non-anon-cvs to the new machine first, say this sunday (2003-01-12) or next (2003-01-19), then say the mailing lists, then http? I would think that anon-cvs and ftp could be brought in line later, and perhaps the old server can just stick with these anyway? Good idea? -benjamin