From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24647 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2003 00:44:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24621 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2003 00:44:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.225) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 14 Jan 2003 00:44:34 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id D71C11C1E2; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:45:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:44:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Hans-Peter Nilsson Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: htdig/archives out-of-sync now? Message-ID: <20030114004516.GA18982@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Hans-Peter Nilsson , overseers@sources.redhat.com References: <20030113140044.A62405@molenda.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 07:17:39PM -0500, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 04:35:49PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> > Some people in the cygwin mailing list have noticed that searches are >> > not providing correct URLs. I assume this is probably due to some >> > renumbering after last week's mysterious out-of-disk-space problem. >> > >> > HP, do we need to regenerate the indexes or will this just fix itself >> > automatically? > >Assuming they mean archives from *this* year, then: > >On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Jason Molenda wrote: >(Reply time-space anomaly corrected.) >> Yeah, my dirty little secret is that messages archived between >> 2003-01-09 and 2003-01-13 may be switched around a tiny bit. >> Just a tiny bit! And I figured it'd be all fresh and new and >> not have links to it. ;) >> >> htdig will notice that the files have changed and should reindex. > >Other than that, they didn't happen to mention *what* URLs, what >dates, were "incorrect" and what kind of incorrectness? No >sybjects in >mention "archive" or "search". The search I did was from this month. It was for "perldoc". The very first match was off: http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?sort=time&config=htdig&words=perldoc&restrict=%2Fml%2Fcygwin%2F2003-01%2F cgf