From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26953 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2003 22:07:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26944 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2003 22:07:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.225) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2003 22:07:09 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 91BAE1BD63; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:08:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:07:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Andrew Cagney Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: sources.redhat.com downtime Message-ID: <20030116220812.GB30790@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , overseers@sources.redhat.com References: <20030116210948.GA29932@redhat.com> <3E27224F.3080500@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E27224F.3080500@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 04:21:19PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: >>I have been negotiating with various parties on downtime for >>sources.redhat.com so that I can make the switch to the new system. >> >>So far, it looks like 1PM on Saturday is doable. Pessimistically >>speaking, I assume that the system will probably be down until >>Sunday morning. > >Who's 1pm saturday? Wow, this was predictable. Put it this way. If you try to access sources.redhat.com and find that it is unavailable then that will be a good indication of which I meant. cgf