From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9539 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2003 16:20:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9532 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2003 16:20:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.225) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2003 16:20:36 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id B8E2D1BD64; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:21:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:20:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Andrew Cagney Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: sources.redhat.com downtime Message-ID: <20030117162142.GI4335@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , "Joseph S. Myers" , overseers@sources.redhat.com References: <3E273C8E.8030203@redhat.com> <20030117153716.GB4335@redhat.com> <3E282B74.30805@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E282B74.30805@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:12:36AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: >>On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:19:06AM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Cagney wrote: >>> >> >>>>> I can set the time to GMT on the new system, if everybody agrees that >>>>is >>>>> reasonable. It seems reasonable to me. >> >>>> >>>>Yes please. This was discussed before, the consensus then being that a >>>>new machine could have this change (just not the old machine). >> >>> >>>Thanks, just note if fixing up crontabs that at least gccadmin's crontab >>>is CVS-controlled (/cvs/gcc/gcc/maintainer-scripts/) - I don't know about >>>others, but presume in general that jobs should continue to run at the >>>same absolute time each day. >> >> >>Is there any reason why I can't leave that to the maintainers of the >>individual >>crontab owners? I do have all of the crontab entries running, but getting >>the >>times right could be tricky. You can't just add 8 to the hours, obviously. > >None. > >In fact I think gcc and gdb's cron should start out disabled. Relevent >admins can re-start them with adjusted timezones once other things have >settled. That is actually what I've done. The crontab entries are there but they are commented out. cgf (already stressed with a day to go)