From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3525 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2003 00:23:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3517 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2003 00:23:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO molenda.com) (192.220.74.81) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 1 Feb 2003 00:23:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 33141 invoked by uid 19025); 1 Feb 2003 00:23:02 -0000 Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 00:23:00 -0000 From: Jason Molenda To: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: procps repository Message-ID: <20030131162302.A32411@molenda.com> References: <1044056907.882.37.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1044056907.882.37.camel@phantasy>; from rml@tech9.net on Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 06:48:28PM -0500 X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00227.txt.bz2 I know no context here so I'm not going to reply, but a quick look around shows no mailing lists called "procps-list" or "procps-bugs" on sourceware. No mailing list archives of these lists, either. And ~ftp/pub/procps also doesn't exist. J On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 06:48:28PM -0500, Robert Love wrote: > Overseer, > > I am one of the maintainers of the procps project, which is graciously > hosted at sources.redhat.com. There are a couple of issues I want to > raise in hopes of a solution. > > - First, the spam on the list is awful. Take a look at the archives for > an example. It is measured in multiple-messages-per-day and it probably > outranks legit email 10 to 1. That is an awful signal to noise ratio. > I am on other Red Hat lists (libc-alpha, etc.) and they are not heavily > spammed, so I assume the filter code is in place. Can a filter be > installed, please? > > - Second, the Reply-To header is forced to the list, and not the > recipient. I think everyone agrees this is evil. > > - Third, the CVSWEB repository does not exist. Would it be possible to > enable CVSWEB for procps? > > - Finally, the procps-bugs mailing list can be removed in favor of all > messages going to procps-list. > > Note the community appreciates Red Hat's resources for this project. > This is not a bitch - I merely want to point out these issues and see if > anything constructive can be done about them. > > Thank you! > > Robert Love