From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32287 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2003 21:26:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32267 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2003 21:26:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO molenda.com) (192.220.74.81) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 6 Feb 2003 21:26:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 45933 invoked by uid 19025); 6 Feb 2003 21:26:47 -0000 Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 21:26:00 -0000 From: Jason Molenda To: Zack Weinberg Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [gcc-announce-owner@gcc.gnu.org] Returned post for gcc-announce@gcc.gnu.org Message-ID: <20030206132647.A45547@molenda.com> References: <87ptq5kswl.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <87ptq5kswl.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>; from zack@codesourcery.com on Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:20:42PM -0800 X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00267.txt.bz2 The moderators are law@redhat.com and mark@codesourcery.com--one of them apparently rejected the post (or made a mistake while trying to approve it). On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:20:42PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote: > > How do I get this posted to gcc-announce? > > zw > > Date: 6 Feb 2003 21:01:11 -0000 > From: gcc-announce-owner@gcc.gnu.org > To: zack@codesourcery.com > Subject: Returned post for gcc-announce@gcc.gnu.org > > Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the > gcc-announce@gcc.gnu.org mailing list. > > I'm sorry, your message (enclosed) was not accepted by the moderator. > If the moderator has made any comments, they are shown below. > To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-announce@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: #import, #pragma once to be removed in 3.4 > From: Zack Weinberg > Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 12:49:19 -0800 > > > So we had a discussion of the problems that PCH poses for #import, > which expanded to a discussion of the problems of #import and > #pragma once generally, which then pretty much wound down without any > middle ground being found between 'there must be some way to fix it' > and 'no, sorry, there isn't'. I think that an executive decision is > required at this point, which falls to me as cpplib maintainer. > > Accordingly: #import and #pragma once will be removed from FSF GCC in > 3.4. I will shortly send a patch to gcc-patches to implement that. > > I have heard the concerns of the people who have problems with the > remaining mechanism for idempotent #include, i.e. wrapper #ifndefs. > I have a solution in mind, but I would first like to determine how > widespread these problems are. Please reply to this message > (do NOT cc: gcc-announce) if you have experienced problems with > collisions between macro names used in wrapper #ifndefs, or any other > technical problem with this mechanism. Please also advise if you > could not work around the problem by editing the offending headers. > > zw