Now I do need PR gdb/701

Now I do need PR gdb/701

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

I've got this FAIL in gdb HEAD happening in test script gdb.mi/gdb701.exp.
This is for PR gdb/701, which is missing from the database.

So not only is it missing, but now it turns out that I actually
need to read the PR.  Small world.

Can you recover this, or let me know if it's too much of a hassle
to recover?

Here are the messages that I found in gdb-prs archives:

  http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-prs/2002-q3/msg00238.html
  http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-prs/2002-q3/msg00240.html

Michael C

Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701

[Angela Marie Thomas]

> I've got this FAIL in gdb HEAD happening in test script gdb.mi/gdb701.exp.
> This is for PR gdb/701, which is missing from the database.
> 
> So not only is it missing, but now it turns out that I actually
> need to read the PR.  Small world.
> 
> Can you recover this, or let me know if it's too much of a hassle
> to recover?
> 
> Here are the messages that I found in gdb-prs archives:
> 
>   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-prs/2002-q3/msg00238.html
>   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-prs/2002-q3/msg00240.html
> 
> Michael C

I think someone fixed it.  At least gdb/701 seems to exist now.

There was no gdb/701 in the backups but there was a gdb/701.old.  I'm
guessing that something went wonky with gnats on that day (it was
Fri the 13th after all) which resulted in the failure.

--Angela

Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701

[Christopher Faylor]

On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:31:03AM -0800, Angela Marie Thomas wrote:
>
>> I've got this FAIL in gdb HEAD happening in test script gdb.mi/gdb701.exp.
>> This is for PR gdb/701, which is missing from the database.
>> 
>> So not only is it missing, but now it turns out that I actually
>> need to read the PR.  Small world.
>> 
>> Can you recover this, or let me know if it's too much of a hassle
>> to recover?
>> 
>> Here are the messages that I found in gdb-prs archives:
>> 
>>   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-prs/2002-q3/msg00238.html
>>   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-prs/2002-q3/msg00240.html
>> 
>> Michael C
>
>I think someone fixed it.  At least gdb/701 seems to exist now.

Yes, that was me.

cgf

Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701

[Angela Marie Thomas]

> Yes, that was me.
> 
> cgf

I think the db file must also get regenerated similar to the two files
I restored before.

--Angela

Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701

[Christopher Faylor]

On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:48:05AM -0800, Angela Marie Thomas wrote:
>>Yes, that was me.
>
>I think the db file must also get regenerated similar to the two files
>I restored before.

I was still researching how to do this between other email and phone
calls.  I've done it before but I don't remember how.

Probably because I hate gnats and the info doesn't stick in my brain.

cgf

Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701

[Angela Marie Thomas]

> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:48:05AM -0800, Angela Marie Thomas wrote:
> >>Yes, that was me.
> >
> >I think the db file must also get regenerated similar to the two files
> >I restored before.
> 
> I was still researching how to do this between other email and phone
> calls.  I've done it before but I don't remember how.
> 
> Probably because I hate gnats and the info doesn't stick in my brain.
> 
> cgf

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2002-q4/msg00250.html

That's where Tom told me what to do.  IIRC, there was no obvious locking
mechanism so I did it when the system was quiet.

--Angela

Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701

[Jason Molenda]

On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:00:14PM -0800, Angela Marie Thomas wrote:

> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2002-q4/msg00250.html
> 
> That's where Tom told me what to do.  IIRC, there was no obvious locking
> mechanism so I did it when the system was quiet.


FWIW when I did this last, I had gen-index output to a new filename
("index.new"), looked to see that index hadn't been changed while
I was generating the new one, and swapped them with mv.

J

Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701

[Christopher Faylor]

On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:09:15PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:00:14PM -0800, Angela Marie Thomas wrote:
>
>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2002-q4/msg00250.html
>> 
>> That's where Tom told me what to do.  IIRC, there was no obvious locking
>> mechanism so I did it when the system was quiet.
>
>
>FWIW when I did this last, I had gen-index output to a new filename
>("index.new"), looked to see that index hadn't been changed while
>I was generating the new one, and swapped them with mv.

Ah, that's right.  I think I did something similar in the past.

I'll do that now.  I'm in a boring meeting so it is perfect timing.

cgf

Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701

[Christopher Faylor]

On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:11:11PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:09:15PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>>On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:00:14PM -0800, Angela Marie Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2002-q4/msg00250.html
>>> 
>>> That's where Tom told me what to do.  IIRC, there was no obvious locking
>>> mechanism so I did it when the system was quiet.
>>
>>
>>FWIW when I did this last, I had gen-index output to a new filename
>>("index.new"), looked to see that index hadn't been changed while
>>I was generating the new one, and swapped them with mv.
>
>Ah, that's right.  I think I did something similar in the past.
>
>I'll do that now.  I'm in a boring meeting so it is perfect timing.

It should be back.

cgf

Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701

[Angela Marie Thomas]

> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:00:14PM -0800, Angela Marie Thomas wrote:
> 
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2002-q4/msg00250.html
> > 
> > That's where Tom told me what to do.  IIRC, there was no obvious locking
> > mechanism so I did it when the system was quiet.
> 
> 
> FWIW when I did this last, I had gen-index output to a new filename
> ("index.new"), looked to see that index hadn't been changed while
> I was generating the new one, and swapped them with mv.
> 
> J

That's actually what I did.  I also ran it again after the mv to make
sure I didn't miss anything and triple checked the mailing lists.

Always pays to be paranoid.  O:-)

--Angela

Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

I see PR gdb/701 now.

Thanks Chris and Angela and Jason.

Michael C

Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

I am still not seeing it.  Gory details:

  red hat linux 8.0
  lynx http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs
  hit 'bug database'
  follow the redirection link
  enter 701 for view number
  hit 'view'
  output:
    View Problem Report: 701
    Error: no PRs matched

  red hat linux 8.0
  mozilla http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs
  click on 'bug database'
  enter 701 for view number
  click on 'view'
  output:
    View Problem Report: 701
    Error: no PRs matched

Also, I can 'query all' including the closed reports and there is
nothing between 700 and 702.  And I see: '1041 matches found', although
the last number is 1042.

I tried the 'query all' in both lynx and mozilla.  In mozilla, I tried
both user 'guest' and also as user 'chastain'.

Michael C