* Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701
@ 2003-02-07 6:18 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-02-07 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cgf, overseers
I see PR gdb/701 now.
Thanks Chris and Angela and Jason.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701
2003-02-06 20:09 ` Jason Molenda
2003-02-06 20:10 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2003-02-07 0:05 ` Angela Marie Thomas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Angela Marie Thomas @ 2003-02-07 0:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: Christopher Faylor, Michael Elizabeth Chastain, overseers
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:00:14PM -0800, Angela Marie Thomas wrote:
>
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2002-q4/msg00250.html
> >
> > That's where Tom told me what to do. IIRC, there was no obvious locking
> > mechanism so I did it when the system was quiet.
>
>
> FWIW when I did this last, I had gen-index output to a new filename
> ("index.new"), looked to see that index hadn't been changed while
> I was generating the new one, and swapped them with mv.
>
> J
That's actually what I did. I also ran it again after the mv to make
sure I didn't miss anything and triple checked the mailing lists.
Always pays to be paranoid. O:-)
--Angela
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701
2003-02-06 20:10 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2003-02-06 20:17 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-02-06 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, overseers
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:11:11PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:09:15PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>>On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:00:14PM -0800, Angela Marie Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2002-q4/msg00250.html
>>>
>>> That's where Tom told me what to do. IIRC, there was no obvious locking
>>> mechanism so I did it when the system was quiet.
>>
>>
>>FWIW when I did this last, I had gen-index output to a new filename
>>("index.new"), looked to see that index hadn't been changed while
>>I was generating the new one, and swapped them with mv.
>
>Ah, that's right. I think I did something similar in the past.
>
>I'll do that now. I'm in a boring meeting so it is perfect timing.
It should be back.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701
2003-02-06 20:09 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2003-02-06 20:10 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-06 20:17 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-07 0:05 ` Angela Marie Thomas
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-02-06 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: angela, Michael Elizabeth Chastain, overseers
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:09:15PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:00:14PM -0800, Angela Marie Thomas wrote:
>
>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2002-q4/msg00250.html
>>
>> That's where Tom told me what to do. IIRC, there was no obvious locking
>> mechanism so I did it when the system was quiet.
>
>
>FWIW when I did this last, I had gen-index output to a new filename
>("index.new"), looked to see that index hadn't been changed while
>I was generating the new one, and swapped them with mv.
Ah, that's right. I think I did something similar in the past.
I'll do that now. I'm in a boring meeting so it is perfect timing.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701
2003-02-06 20:06 ` Angela Marie Thomas
@ 2003-02-06 20:09 ` Jason Molenda
2003-02-06 20:10 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-07 0:05 ` Angela Marie Thomas
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2003-02-06 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: angela; +Cc: Christopher Faylor, Michael Elizabeth Chastain, overseers
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:00:14PM -0800, Angela Marie Thomas wrote:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2002-q4/msg00250.html
>
> That's where Tom told me what to do. IIRC, there was no obvious locking
> mechanism so I did it when the system was quiet.
FWIW when I did this last, I had gen-index output to a new filename
("index.new"), looked to see that index hadn't been changed while
I was generating the new one, and swapped them with mv.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701
2003-02-06 19:57 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2003-02-06 20:06 ` Angela Marie Thomas
2003-02-06 20:09 ` Jason Molenda
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Angela Marie Thomas @ 2003-02-06 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, overseers
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:48:05AM -0800, Angela Marie Thomas wrote:
> >>Yes, that was me.
> >
> >I think the db file must also get regenerated similar to the two files
> >I restored before.
>
> I was still researching how to do this between other email and phone
> calls. I've done it before but I don't remember how.
>
> Probably because I hate gnats and the info doesn't stick in my brain.
>
> cgf
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2002-q4/msg00250.html
That's where Tom told me what to do. IIRC, there was no obvious locking
mechanism so I did it when the system was quiet.
--Angela
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701
2003-02-06 19:54 ` Angela Marie Thomas
@ 2003-02-06 19:57 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-06 20:06 ` Angela Marie Thomas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-02-06 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: angela; +Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, overseers
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:48:05AM -0800, Angela Marie Thomas wrote:
>>Yes, that was me.
>
>I think the db file must also get regenerated similar to the two files
>I restored before.
I was still researching how to do this between other email and phone
calls. I've done it before but I don't remember how.
Probably because I hate gnats and the info doesn't stick in my brain.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701
2003-02-06 19:46 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2003-02-06 19:54 ` Angela Marie Thomas
2003-02-06 19:57 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Angela Marie Thomas @ 2003-02-06 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, overseers
> Yes, that was me.
>
> cgf
I think the db file must also get regenerated similar to the two files
I restored before.
--Angela
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701
@ 2003-02-06 19:49 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-02-06 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: angela; +Cc: overseers
I am still not seeing it. Gory details:
red hat linux 8.0
lynx http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs
hit 'bug database'
follow the redirection link
enter 701 for view number
hit 'view'
output:
View Problem Report: 701
Error: no PRs matched
red hat linux 8.0
mozilla http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs
click on 'bug database'
enter 701 for view number
click on 'view'
output:
View Problem Report: 701
Error: no PRs matched
Also, I can 'query all' including the closed reports and there is
nothing between 700 and 702. And I see: '1041 matches found', although
the last number is 1042.
I tried the 'query all' in both lynx and mozilla. In mozilla, I tried
both user 'guest' and also as user 'chastain'.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701
2003-02-06 19:37 ` Angela Marie Thomas
@ 2003-02-06 19:46 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-06 19:54 ` Angela Marie Thomas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-02-06 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: angela; +Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, overseers
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:31:03AM -0800, Angela Marie Thomas wrote:
>
>> I've got this FAIL in gdb HEAD happening in test script gdb.mi/gdb701.exp.
>> This is for PR gdb/701, which is missing from the database.
>>
>> So not only is it missing, but now it turns out that I actually
>> need to read the PR. Small world.
>>
>> Can you recover this, or let me know if it's too much of a hassle
>> to recover?
>>
>> Here are the messages that I found in gdb-prs archives:
>>
>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-prs/2002-q3/msg00238.html
>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-prs/2002-q3/msg00240.html
>>
>> Michael C
>
>I think someone fixed it. At least gdb/701 seems to exist now.
Yes, that was me.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Now I do need PR gdb/701
2003-02-06 18:48 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
@ 2003-02-06 19:37 ` Angela Marie Thomas
2003-02-06 19:46 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Angela Marie Thomas @ 2003-02-06 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain; +Cc: overseers
> I've got this FAIL in gdb HEAD happening in test script gdb.mi/gdb701.exp.
> This is for PR gdb/701, which is missing from the database.
>
> So not only is it missing, but now it turns out that I actually
> need to read the PR. Small world.
>
> Can you recover this, or let me know if it's too much of a hassle
> to recover?
>
> Here are the messages that I found in gdb-prs archives:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-prs/2002-q3/msg00238.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-prs/2002-q3/msg00240.html
>
> Michael C
I think someone fixed it. At least gdb/701 seems to exist now.
There was no gdb/701 in the backups but there was a gdb/701.old. I'm
guessing that something went wonky with gnats on that day (it was
Fri the 13th after all) which resulted in the failure.
--Angela
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Now I do need PR gdb/701
@ 2003-02-06 18:48 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-02-06 19:37 ` Angela Marie Thomas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-02-06 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
I've got this FAIL in gdb HEAD happening in test script gdb.mi/gdb701.exp.
This is for PR gdb/701, which is missing from the database.
So not only is it missing, but now it turns out that I actually
need to read the PR. Small world.
Can you recover this, or let me know if it's too much of a hassle
to recover?
Here are the messages that I found in gdb-prs archives:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-prs/2002-q3/msg00238.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-prs/2002-q3/msg00240.html
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-02-07 6:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-07 6:18 Now I do need PR gdb/701 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-06 19:49 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-02-06 18:48 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-02-06 19:37 ` Angela Marie Thomas
2003-02-06 19:46 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-06 19:54 ` Angela Marie Thomas
2003-02-06 19:57 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-06 20:06 ` Angela Marie Thomas
2003-02-06 20:09 ` Jason Molenda
2003-02-06 20:10 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-06 20:17 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-02-07 0:05 ` Angela Marie Thomas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).