From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3431 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2003 14:30:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3424 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 14:30:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.225) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 14:30:14 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id B367C1C21B; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:30:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:30:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Ian Lance Taylor Cc: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: /sourceware/snapshot-tmp is full Message-ID: <20030227143028.GB5049@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ian Lance Taylor , overseers@sourceware.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00335.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:00:30PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >The binutils snapshot process failed because /sourceware/snapshot-tmp >is full. Most of the space is taken up by the gdb-snapshot >directory. It has a number of tar files apparently created over the >last couple of weeks. Perhaps a cleanup script is broken? Yes, it looks like gdb is keeping all of its snapshots around. cgf