From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3520 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2003 19:59:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3506 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2003 19:59:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (24.131.133.249) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2003 19:59:31 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 4687B1C21D; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:59:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 19:59:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: overseers@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Postmaster@ali.com.tw: ???e????: Error delivering to CNALINM3/ALI_SHA/ACER MAIL\0109501; 26:AA] Message-ID: <20030303195943.GA26110@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: overseers@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20030303190851.GA6043@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030303190851.GA6043@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00343.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 02:08:51PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >[Is overseers also responsible for list management or should I be using >gdb-owner?] overseers is responsible for everything on sources.redhat.com. >If it's obvious what subscribed address this is, could we get him >removed from the gdb@ list? I unsubscribed this guy. cgf