* Re: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c
[not found] <20030308234157.GA30916@schiele.local>
@ 2003-03-08 23:45 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2003-03-09 0:10 ` Robert Schiele
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson @ 2003-03-08 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Schiele; +Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, gcc, overseers
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Robert Schiele wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 01:58:01PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> > I'm seeing CVS corruption in gcc/unroll.c.
>
> Yeah, not only there. It seems subversions is completely broken. I
> hope, it is only subversions that is broken. Maybe someone wants to
> resync the whole tree.
Please contact the subversions people, whomever they are and
tell them. (Thanks in advance.) AFAIK rsync is initiated from
there, not from gcc.gnu.org.
brgds, H-P
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c
2003-03-08 23:45 ` cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c Hans-Peter Nilsson
@ 2003-03-09 0:10 ` Robert Schiele
2003-03-09 0:19 ` Jason Molenda
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert Schiele @ 2003-03-09 0:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson
Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, gcc, overseers, cvs-hackers
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1199 bytes --]
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 06:45:00PM -0500, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Robert Schiele wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 01:58:01PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> > > I'm seeing CVS corruption in gcc/unroll.c.
> >
> > Yeah, not only there. It seems subversions is completely broken. I
> > hope, it is only subversions that is broken. Maybe someone wants to
> > resync the whole tree.
>
> Please contact the subversions people, whomever they are and
> tell them. (Thanks in advance.) AFAIK rsync is initiated from
> there, not from gcc.gnu.org.
Hmm, I also don't know, who is responsible for this cvs mirror. But
as cvs-hackers@gnu.org is the only mail address mentioned on the
subversions web server, I added this one to CC. Hope someone reads
this that feels responsible.
Otherwise all the anonymous cvs readers might switch back to the main
tree, which would be a pitty, because that would most likely lead to
enormous load problems there again, as we had before subversions was
the "official" anonymous cvs source.
Robert
--
Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2517
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c
2003-03-09 0:10 ` Robert Schiele
@ 2003-03-09 0:19 ` Jason Molenda
2003-03-09 0:38 ` Robert Schiele
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2003-03-09 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Schiele
Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson, Michael Elizabeth Chastain, overseers, cvs-hackers
Just to confirm - the subversions.gnu.org mirror of the gcc repository
is done entirely from the subversions.gnu.org side. Unless the problem
exists on gcc.gnu.org, or rsync is dishing out bad data, there isn't
anything we can do from here.
J
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 01:08:45AM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 06:45:00PM -0500, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Robert Schiele wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 01:58:01PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> > > > I'm seeing CVS corruption in gcc/unroll.c.
> > >
> > > Yeah, not only there. It seems subversions is completely broken. I
> > > hope, it is only subversions that is broken. Maybe someone wants to
> > > resync the whole tree.
> >
> > Please contact the subversions people, whomever they are and
> > tell them. (Thanks in advance.) AFAIK rsync is initiated from
> > there, not from gcc.gnu.org.
>
> Hmm, I also don't know, who is responsible for this cvs mirror. But
> as cvs-hackers@gnu.org is the only mail address mentioned on the
> subversions web server, I added this one to CC. Hope someone reads
> this that feels responsible.
>
> Otherwise all the anonymous cvs readers might switch back to the main
> tree, which would be a pitty, because that would most likely lead to
> enormous load problems there again, as we had before subversions was
> the "official" anonymous cvs source.
>
> Robert
>
> --
> Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2517
> Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c
2003-03-09 0:19 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2003-03-09 0:38 ` Robert Schiele
2003-03-09 2:55 ` Jason Molenda
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert Schiele @ 2003-03-09 0:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda
Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson, Michael Elizabeth Chastain, overseers, cvs-hackers
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 888 bytes --]
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:20:34PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
> Just to confirm - the subversions.gnu.org mirror of the gcc repository
> is done entirely from the subversions.gnu.org side. Unless the problem
> exists on gcc.gnu.org, or rsync is dishing out bad data, there isn't
> anything we can do from here.
I understand that. But as
:pserver:anoncvs@subversions.gnu.org:/cvsroot/gcc is mentioned on
http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html for "official" cvs anonymous read access
without any special contact address, this mailing list seems to be the
canonical place to discuss problems with this service in the hope that
the operators of the service are also reading this list. Otherwise a
contact address should also be given on http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html.
Robert
--
Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2517
Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c
2003-03-09 0:38 ` Robert Schiele
@ 2003-03-09 2:55 ` Jason Molenda
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2003-03-09 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Schiele; +Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson, Michael Elizabeth Chastain, overseers
Hey Robert,
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 01:36:35AM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:20:34PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
> > Unless the problem
> > exists on gcc.gnu.org, or rsync is dishing out bad data, there isn't
> > anything we can do from here.
>
> I understand that. But as
> :pserver:anoncvs@subversions.gnu.org:/cvsroot/gcc is mentioned on
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html for "official" cvs anonymous read access
> without any special contact address, this mailing list seems to be the
Yes, reporting the error here is reasonable. My concern was that we
had three mailing lists on the To lines, and any one of them could say,
"Those other guys can deal with it, it's probably their problem." I was
really just making it clear that overseers@gcc.gnu.org couldn't do anything
about this problem.
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c
@ 2003-03-09 6:31 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-03-09 6:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jason-gcclist, rschiele; +Cc: cvs-hackers, gcc, hp, overseers
First, an explanation of why anonymous cvs on subversions has been
slow/broken for the past few days. This is from the front page of
savannah.gnu.org:
Latest News
Server exhausted, mldonkey clients charged
yeupou - Fri 03/07/03 at 05:27 - 3 messages
The Savannah server is currently exhausted because hundred of mldonkey
clients are trying to download differents files as servers-list or
motd (server.met, motd.html, motd.conf, peers.ocl).
Despite the fact that we now fordib access to this kind of data, it
still creates tons of http connections and generates lot of CPU usage.
mldonkey is a p2p program developed as a savannah project. A recent
release of mldonkey contained savannah URL's for its configuration
files, so myriads of mldonkey users are pounding the servers for its
configuration files. (Literally: one 'myriad' is 10,000, and they
are seeing about 100,000 connections per day from mldonkey users).
I'm just mentioning this because it's relevant news and nobody else
has mentioned it yet. I don't want to start a big off-topic thread
about it.
My armchair guess, as an outside amateur kind of guy, is that
gcc.gnu.org is fine and that subversions.gnu.org is suffering some
thrashing-induced corruption.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-09 6:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20030308234157.GA30916@schiele.local>
2003-03-08 23:45 ` cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c Hans-Peter Nilsson
2003-03-09 0:10 ` Robert Schiele
2003-03-09 0:19 ` Jason Molenda
2003-03-09 0:38 ` Robert Schiele
2003-03-09 2:55 ` Jason Molenda
2003-03-09 6:31 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).