* [Bug web/3119] Broken gcc mailing list archives
[not found] <20010611022600.3119.jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
@ 2003-07-06 22:42 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-17 8:40 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-17 8:40 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-06 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, |
|jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org|
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug web/3119] Broken gcc mailing list archives
[not found] <20010611022600.3119.jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
2003-07-06 22:42 ` [Bug web/3119] Broken gcc mailing list archives jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-17 8:40 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-17 8:40 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-17 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|reichelt at igpm dot rwth- |
|aachen dot de |
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug web/3119] Broken gcc mailing list archives
[not found] <20010611022600.3119.jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
2003-07-06 22:42 ` [Bug web/3119] Broken gcc mailing list archives jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-17 8:40 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-07-17 8:40 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-17 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|reichelt at igpm dot rwth- |
|aachen dot de |
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20010611022600.3119.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>]
* [Bug web/3119] Broken gcc mailing list archives
[not found] <20010611022600.3119.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>
@ 2005-03-22 18:59 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-03-22 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-22 13:08 -------
The remaining action needed on this bug report is that the archives for
March 2001 should still be regenerated (resulting in "2001-03n" directories,
I suppose) from the mbox archives; likewise those for the quarter or year
containing March 2001, for those archived quarterly or yearly (using
qmail archives where ftp mbox ones not available, i.e. gcc-cvs-wwwdocs).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <bug-3119-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>]
* [Bug web/3119] Broken gcc mailing list archives
[not found] <bug-3119-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-12-10 5:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-12 6:50 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-12-12 8:03 ` me at cgf dot cx
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-10 5:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2005-09-07 16:53:59 |2005-12-10 05:30:21
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug web/3119] Broken gcc mailing list archives
2005-12-10 5:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-12 6:50 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2005-12-12 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 05:30:21AM -0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>--
>
>pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Last reconfirmed|2005-09-07 16:53:59 |2005-12-10 05:30:21
> date| |
>
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
>
>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Given the age of these bugs should we just close them as "wontfix"? I don't
see anyone stepping up to fix them anytime soon.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/3119] Broken gcc mailing list archives
[not found] <bug-3119-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-12-10 5:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-12 8:03 ` me at cgf dot cx
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: me at cgf dot cx @ 2005-12-12 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #8 from me at cgf dot cx 2005-12-10 05:45 -------
Subject: Re: Broken gcc mailing list archives
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 05:30:21AM -0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>--
>
>pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Last reconfirmed|2005-09-07 16:53:59 |2005-12-10 05:30:21
> date| |
>
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
>
>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Given the age of these bugs should we just close them as "wontfix"? I don't
see anyone stepping up to fix them anytime soon.
cgf
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <bug-3119-5127@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>]
* [Bug web/3119] Broken gcc mailing list archives
[not found] <bug-3119-5127@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2017-07-23 12:43 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2017-07-23 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to cgf@gcc.gnu.org from comment #8)
> Subject: Re: Broken gcc mailing list archives
>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 05:30:21AM -0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
> wrote:
> >
> >--
> >
> >pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
> >
> > What |Removed |Added
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Last reconfirmed|2005-09-07 16:53:59 |2005-12-10 05:30:21
> > date| |
> >
> >
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
> >
> >------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> >You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>
> Given the age of these bugs should we just close them as "wontfix"? I don't
> see anyone stepping up to fix them anytime soon.
>
> cgf
OK, doing that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-23 12:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20010611022600.3119.jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
2003-07-06 22:42 ` [Bug web/3119] Broken gcc mailing list archives jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-17 8:40 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-17 8:40 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <20010611022600.3119.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>
2005-03-22 18:59 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-3119-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-12-10 5:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-12 6:50 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-12-12 8:03 ` me at cgf dot cx
[not found] <bug-3119-5127@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2017-07-23 12:43 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).