From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17091 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2003 18:12:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17082 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2003 18:12:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.187.230.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2003 18:12:12 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 7FFFB32A822; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:12:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:12:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Bernardo Innocenti Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Fwd: CVS write access Message-ID: <20030820181211.GA26648@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Bernardo Innocenti , overseers@sources.redhat.com References: <200308201928.34874.bernie@develer.com> <20030820174112.GA25994@redhat.com> <200308202005.36913.bernie@develer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200308202005.36913.bernie@develer.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:05:36PM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: >On Wednesday 20 August 2003 19:41, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> >On August 14, I've applied for CVS write access using the web form on >> >sources.redhat.com, and I've still got no confirmation. >> >> That's because you used "bernie@gcc.gnu.org" as your email address when >> you submitted the form. That is obviously an invalid email address. >> > >Oh, I misunderstood the instructions. Point 3 is a bit misleading IMHO: > > 1. First and last name > 2. Preferred login name > 3. A forwarding e-mail address (where mail should go if it is sent to you @sources.redhat.com or @gcc.gnu.org) > 4. What project this is for ("gdb", "automake", "gnats", etc.) > 5. Who approved your access > 6. An SSH public key, generated with ssh-keygen "A forwarding email address" is misleading? It's a pretty standard concept, or at least it should be for the target audience. cgf