From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19053 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2003 18:22:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19041 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2003 18:22:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO develer.com) (151.38.19.110) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2003 18:22:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 31409 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2003 18:15:30 -0000 Received: from beetle.trilan (?klguRQJtP1sj/iV6lH8Xrk/Kw/eb2gcn?@10.3.3.220) by trinity.trilan with SMTP; 20 Aug 2003 18:15:30 -0000 From: Bernardo Innocenti Organization: Develer S.r.l. To: Christopher Faylor Subject: Re: Fwd: CVS write access Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:22:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com References: <200308201928.34874.bernie@develer.com> <200308202005.36913.bernie@develer.com> <20030820181211.GA26648@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20030820181211.GA26648@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200308202015.30209.bernie@develer.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 20 August 2003 20:12, Christopher Faylor wrote: > "A forwarding email address" is misleading? It's a pretty standard > concept, or at least it should be for the target audience. It's the same I've been using on SF... Ok, it's been kinda stupid of me :-) -- // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept. \X/ http://www.develer.com/ Please don't send Word attachments - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html