From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22493 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2003 18:41:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22483 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2003 18:41:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO disaster.jaj.com) (66.93.21.106) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Sep 2003 18:41:43 -0000 Received: from disaster.jaj.com (localhost.localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disaster.jaj.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h87IfgUC025680 for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 14:41:42 -0400 Received: (from phil@localhost) by disaster.jaj.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h87IfgJ3025679 for overseers@sources.redhat.com; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 14:41:42 -0400 Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 18:41:00 -0000 From: Phil Edwards To: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Mail refused: SPAM Message-ID: <20030907184142.GA25670@disaster.jaj.com> References: <12FCAED0-DFE6-11D7-B1E2-0030657EA24A@apple.com> <20030905211740.GD9925@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030905211740.GD9925@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00208.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 05:17:41PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 02:15:28PM -0700, Geoffrey Keating wrote: > >Someone at luxik.cdi.cz has a misconfigured spam-filter which is using > >a nonfunctional RBL that appears to have gcc.gnu.org listed and they > >are sending responses back to people sending mail to the gcc lists. > >This might already have been dealt with, but if not, could someone > >unsubscribe this person? > > I blocked subjects with "nospam" in them earlier today and unsubscribed > what I think is the offending party. I let him know about this in the > off chance that I was wrong. I think they've resubscribed. I've just sent a message to gcc@ and gcc-regression@, and received the same bounce. Complaining to postmaster@luxik.cdi.cz bounces with "no such user", which IMNSHO means they should simply be banned from talking to anything else on the net.