From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3445 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2003 21:58:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3437 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2003 21:58:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (24.131.133.249) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Sep 2003 21:58:36 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 2C59832A822; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 17:58:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 21:58:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Phil Edwards Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Mail refused: SPAM Message-ID: <20030907215836.GA5192@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Phil Edwards , overseers@sources.redhat.com References: <12FCAED0-DFE6-11D7-B1E2-0030657EA24A@apple.com> <20030905211740.GD9925@redhat.com> <20030907184142.GA25670@disaster.jaj.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030907184142.GA25670@disaster.jaj.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2 On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 02:41:42PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote: >On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 05:17:41PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 02:15:28PM -0700, Geoffrey Keating wrote: >> >Someone at luxik.cdi.cz has a misconfigured spam-filter which is using >> >a nonfunctional RBL that appears to have gcc.gnu.org listed and they >> >are sending responses back to people sending mail to the gcc lists. >> >This might already have been dealt with, but if not, could someone >> >unsubscribe this person? >> >> I blocked subjects with "nospam" in them earlier today and unsubscribed >> what I think is the offending party. I let him know about this in the >> off chance that I was wrong. > >I think they've resubscribed. I've just sent a message to gcc@ >and gcc-regression@, and received the same bounce. Complaining to >postmaster@luxik.cdi.cz bounces with "no such user", which IMNSHO means >they should simply be banned from talking to anything else on the net. Hmm. Sorry. Maybe I hallucinated unsubscribing them or maybe I only unsubscribed them from gcc-help or gcc-bugs. They were still subscribed to the gcc mailing list. I didn't seem them on the gcc-regression mailing list, though. I've unsubscribed this person from every mailing list on the system and added them to the global 'deny-subscribe' mailing list. That's not fully functional (I'm only testing it in the cygwin mailing list) but eventually it will block specified addresses from unsubscribing. cgf