From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27178 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2003 21:50:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27168 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2003 21:50:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (24.131.133.249) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2003 21:50:47 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 622256C718; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 17:50:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 21:50:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Matthew Galgoci Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson , overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: last days of htdig Message-ID: <20030927215040.GB21136@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Galgoci , Hans-Peter Nilsson , overseers@sources.redhat.com References: <20030927152054.GB19912@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00238.txt.bz2 On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:45:26PM -0400, Matthew Galgoci wrote: >On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:18:10AM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: >> >There's been no update since 2003-07-31; that's when some file >> >passed 2G and it all fell apart, save for the existing DB. I'm >> >going to try to exclude parts of gcc.gnu.org from indexing, >> >probably some mailing lists. Just so you know when the machine >> >slows down. :-) If that doesn't work, I think I'm just going to >> >leave it. No fun in that, and anyway it doesn't seem a critical >> >function anymore. >> > >> >(Chris, what happened to the mnogosearch initiative?) >> >> Matt, are you reading this? Want to take a stab at moving to >> mnogosearch? > >Sure. I think we can do that. Well, that's a relief. >> I think we've already been over this ground, HP, but couldn't we >> just recompile htdig on the new kernel to bypass the 2G limit? > >Ewwwwww.... ? I said "kernel" when I really meant glibc but it could have been a real simple way to get things working quickly. cgf