From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25879 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2003 16:21:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25870 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2003 16:21:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2003 16:21:16 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h92GLG125760 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 12:21:16 -0400 Received: from speedy.slc.redhat.com (vpn50-9.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.9]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h92GLEc16554; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 12:21:14 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (law@localhost) by speedy.slc.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id h92GL9ZT009648; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 10:21:09 -0600 Message-Id: <200310021621.h92GL9ZT009648@speedy.slc.redhat.com> X-Authentication-Warning: speedy.slc.redhat.com: law owned process doing -bs To: Matthew Galgoci cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: law@redhat.com Subject: Re: outage window In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 02 Oct 2003 12:12:25 EDT." From: law@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 16:21:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2003-q4/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 In message , Matthew Galgoci writes: > >I need to replace the layer 2 switch that sources.redhat.com hangs off of, an >d >I'd like to do it tomorrow, oct 3, 2003 between 9am and 10am EDT. The current >switch is failing (though it still switching packets). It's a cisco 2900 seri >es >that's expereincing memory errors, like the following: > >%SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 192 bytes failed from 0xE847C, pool P >ro0-Process= "LED Control Process", ipl= 0, pid= 19 >-Traceback= 1CACB8 1CC7AC E8480 103DE4 103FD8 E574C 1F1F68 1F7268 1F1F68 1F30 >300 >%SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 128 bytes failed from 0x1CCFCC, pool >Pr0-Process= "Broadcast Storm Control", ipl= 0, pid= 32 >-Traceback= 1CACB8 1CC7AC 1CCFD0 1D90AC 1D913C E8570 103DE4 103FD8 E574C 1F1F >680 > >The connectivity interruption should be very minor. I expect it to take all o >f 10 minutes >for the entire operation. > >If anyone objects to the time please speak up now, else I'm just going to >go ahead as stated above. Go for it. jeff