From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17652 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2003 00:16:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17527 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2003 00:16:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (24.131.133.249) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Oct 2003 00:16:04 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 10BB932A8A7; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 20:16:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:16:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Hans-Peter Nilsson Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: bug in search engine Message-ID: <20031010001603.GB25442@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Hans-Peter Nilsson , Gerald Pfeifer , overseers@sources.redhat.com References: <20031009220417.GD23269@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-q4/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 06:18:43PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: >On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:54:53PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: >> >The interesting question is why the apache at bitrange.com >> >(1.3.27) does not pass argv and why it does on gcc/sourceware >> >(2.0.40). What confparam is different between my apache and >> >yours? >> >> It has to do with how the web page is constructed. >> >>
>>
>> >> vs. this: >> >>
>>
> >The former can be on *any web page or file:///*. Evildoer >just adds gcc.gnu.org before the /cgi-bin. I suppose that in all of the discussion about "confparam" I missed this simple point.