From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <overseers-return-6256-listarch-overseers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 11838 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2003 17:17:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-help@sources.redhat.com>,
	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 11825 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2003 17:17:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Oct 2003 17:17:51 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9LHHoM03210;
	Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:17:50 -0400
Received: from speedy.slc.redhat.com (vpn50-3.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.3])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9LHHnr16646;
	Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:17:49 -0400
Received: from redhat.com (law@localhost)
	by speedy.slc.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id h9LHHkqM017728;
	Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:17:47 -0600
Message-Id: <200310211717.h9LHHkqM017728@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: speedy.slc.redhat.com: law owned process doing -bs
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
cc: overseers@gcc.gnu.org
Reply-To: law@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Forwarding address for jsm28@gcc.gnu.org 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 21 Oct 2003 01:10:44 +0200."
             <Pine.BSF.4.58.0310210106450.53725@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> 
From: law@redhat.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:17:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2003-q4/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2

In message <Pine.BSF.4.58.0310210106450.53725@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>, Gerald 
Pfeifer writes:
 >On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Jason Molenda wrote:
 >>> Does the subscriber list of gcc-maintainers get (semi-)automatically
 >>> updated from MAINTAINERS using the script Gerald sent in gcc-maintainers
 >>> message 260?
 >> This I know nothing about.
 >
 >The idea is that the list of subscribers to gcc-maintainers is generated
 >automatically from gcc/MAINTAINERS.
 >
 >Back in June, I even hacked a bit of Perl to do that (though I'm sure you
 >could do it in just 1.5 lines <g>) and Jeff used this to regenerate the
 >subscriber list.  Perhaps this could be executed regularily/automatically?
 >
 >(If so, I could add it to gcc/maintainer-scripts, for example.)
Seems reasonable.    Hell, we could do it nightly :-)  Aren't the
cron scripts editable these days?

Jeff