From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <overseers-return-6357-listarch-overseers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8257 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2003 04:27:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-help@sources.redhat.com>,
	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8232 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 04:27:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.40)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 04:27:37 -0000
Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201)
	id AE355400216; Wed,  3 Dec 2003 23:10:00 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 04:27:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: law@redhat.com
Cc: Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com>,
	"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>,
	Matthew Galgoci <mgalgoci@redhat.com>, overseers@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: brk() bug
Message-ID: <20031204041000.GA4360@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: law@redhat.com,
	Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com>,
	"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>,
	Matthew Galgoci <mgalgoci@redhat.com>, overseers@sources.redhat.com
References: <20031203160905.A55970@molenda.com> <200312040332.hB43WGfr017360@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200312040332.hB43WGfr017360@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-q4/txt/msg00203.txt.bz2

On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:32:16PM -0700, law@redhat.com wrote:
>In message <20031203160905.A55970@molenda.com>, Jason Molenda writes:
>>On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:05:47AM +0000, Joseph S.  Myers wrote:
>>>no response.  This bug (anoncvs can create and delete tags) is still
>>>present.  Updates can easily fall through the cracks.
>>
>>
>>Our cvs server is a special case - we have a few local modifications
>>that take time to merge in, and no one has had the time to do that
>>merging.
>>
>>I'm hard pressed to think of any other software we've modified on the
>>system to this extent.
>
>The second largest subsystem that is customized would be the mail
>system.  But I've been pretty happy with the security of qmail :-)

qmail isn't that customized.  It has some known well-maintained patches
but nothing home grown, like CVS.

cgf