From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10653 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2003 03:58:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10646 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2003 03:58:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 03:58:56 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hBA3wt228471 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 22:58:55 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hBA3wt216636 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 22:58:55 -0500 Received: from redhat.com (vpn50-32.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.32]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBA3wt1I032061 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 22:58:55 -0500 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 467DE4000AF; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 22:58:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 03:58:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: filtering out email addresses in mailing list posts Message-ID: <20031210035856.GB6388@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: overseers@sourceware.org References: <20031209192333.GA11966@redhat.com> <20031209133702.B12336@molenda.com> <20031210020313.GB5059@redhat.com> <20031209194526.B16423@molenda.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031209194526.B16423@molenda.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-q4/txt/msg00251.txt.bz2 On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 07:45:26PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote: >On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:03:13PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>I don't mind - my only concern is messing up posted diffs. >> >>Urgh. This would screw up old style diffs wouldn't it? > >I hadn't thought of that -- but if an @ sign is in the middle of a >source file (they show up all the time in Objective C at least :), if a >diff to that code went through the munger it could make the diff not >apply correctly. But, I was only talking about munging @'s after >'s and in "On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 07:45:26PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:"'s Old-style diffs are uncommon. cgf