From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18096 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2004 02:27:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18089 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 02:27:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.40) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 02:27:12 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id D3788400121; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 21:27:11 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 02:27:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Tom Rix , overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Request from Tom Rix Message-ID: <20040108022711.GA6412@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Gerald Pfeifer , Tom Rix , overseers@sources.redhat.com References: <20040107035356.2373.qmail@sources.redhat.com> <20040107144606.GA11714@redhat.com> <000c01c3d580$d2975890$6437a8c0@Charles> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-q1/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 02:49:41AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Tom Rix wrote: >> Then just the ssh key needs to be updated in my authorized_keys file. I >> lost the old key when I had to return my machines as part of my being >> laid off from RH. > >just a general word of warning: since you left RH, you are probably no >longer covered by their general copyright assignment to the FSF, and so >must not contribute non-trivial changes to any GNU software until/unless >copy have filed a personal copyright assignment. > >(I'm pointing this out because it has been a source of problems in the >past. Better safe than sorry... ;-) ) Excellent point. This never occurred to me... Hopefully it won't be too common an occurrence. cgf