From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30919 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2004 16:28:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30877 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2004 16:28:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Jan 2004 16:28:14 -0000 Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (toenail.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.211]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB04800195 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:28:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i0SGSCZU017721 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:28:12 -0500 Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (fche@localhost) by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id i0SGSClm017716 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:28:12 -0500 Message-Id: <200401281628.i0SGSClm017716@toenail.toronto.redhat.com> To: overseers@sources.redhat.com From: fche@redhat.com Subject: Re: Confidentiality notices In-reply-to: Your message of "28 Jan 2004 10:04:22 EST." Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:28:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2004-q1/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2 ian wrote: > I've noticed several e-mails recently with confidentiality notices > which we are violating when we archive the message on the web site. > [...] Are you sure that "we are violating" something? The typical verbal diarrhea warns not to send stuff beyond the intended recipients. Has someone put forward a plausible interpretation that applies even when the intended recipient is a public mailing list? (My impression is that we should expend no effort on issue, and let the notices speak for themselves about the originator's silliness.) - FChE