From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <overseers-return-6560-listarch-overseers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26673 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2004 16:56:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-help@sources.redhat.com>,
	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26658 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2004 16:56:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.40)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2004 16:56:35 -0000
Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201)
	id 473E5400159; Sun,  8 Feb 2004 11:56:35 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 16:56:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: overseers@sources.redhat.com, dberlin@dberlin.org
Subject: Re: creating two new email aliases
Message-ID: <20040208165635.GC1855@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: overseers@sources.redhat.com, dberlin@dberlin.org
References: <478586C4-59F3-11D8-B8AA-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> <m33c9lmznw.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m33c9lmznw.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2004-q1/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2

On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 09:08:51AM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:
>>unassigned@gcc.gnu.org and unassigned@sources.redhat.com
>>
>>They should both just go to /dev/null (ie accept and discard).
>
>Done.

Wait.  Why do we need these again?  Why isn't bugzilla smart enough to
*not send email* to unassigned?

cgf