* A problem with the gcc-patches web archives -- please read
@ 2004-02-21 15:57 Jason Molenda
2004-02-21 16:01 ` Jason Molenda
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2004-02-21 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc, gcc-patches; +Cc: overseers
The web archiver got stuck for about six hours yesterday.
It was restarted, but the messages for the six hours it was
stuck were not archived. The archiving was restarted about
24 hours ago.
I'm currently re-generating the web archives for this month.
It will include the missing 6 hours, but it's important
to note that the URLs used for those messages will overlap
with messages archived over the last 24 hours. In short,
the gcc-patches URLs from the last 24 hours must now be
considered to be different.
I apologize for that, but there aren't many better ways
to handle this.
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: A problem with the gcc-patches web archives -- please read
2004-02-21 15:57 A problem with the gcc-patches web archives -- please read Jason Molenda
@ 2004-02-21 16:01 ` Jason Molenda
2004-02-21 20:18 ` Jason Molenda
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2004-02-21 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
The old directory is saved aside as "2004-02.o".
I'm not sure if the regen will finish before I have to leave
for the day -- it's only about 10% done and I'm out of here
in 25 minutes, no flexibility. The script I'm using to
do this is in the sourceware CVS repo,
infra/ml-archiving/ml-regen-from-txtfiles.sh. With luck it'll
finish without any problems and no one will need to do anything.
But if it doesn't work out, that's what I did.
J
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 07:57:35AM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
> The web archiver got stuck for about six hours yesterday.
> It was restarted, but the messages for the six hours it was
> stuck were not archived. The archiving was restarted about
> 24 hours ago.
>
> I'm currently re-generating the web archives for this month.
> It will include the missing 6 hours, but it's important
> to note that the URLs used for those messages will overlap
> with messages archived over the last 24 hours. In short,
> the gcc-patches URLs from the last 24 hours must now be
> considered to be different.
>
> I apologize for that, but there aren't many better ways
> to handle this.
>
> Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-21 20:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-21 15:57 A problem with the gcc-patches web archives -- please read Jason Molenda
2004-02-21 16:01 ` Jason Molenda
2004-02-21 20:18 ` Jason Molenda
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).