From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16046 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2004 17:40:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16030 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2004 17:40:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO igw2.watson.ibm.com) (129.34.20.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2004 17:40:53 -0000 Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [129.34.20.41]) by igw2.watson.ibm.com (8.11.7-20030924/8.11.4) with ESMTP id i36Hepq67324 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 13:40:52 -0400 Received: from makai.watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.7-20030924/8.11.7/8.11.7-01-14-2004) with ESMTP id i36Hepu117262 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 13:40:51 -0400 Received: from watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makai.watson.ibm.com (AIX5.1/8.11.6p2/8.11.0/03-06-2002) with ESMTP id i36HeoT28142 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 13:40:50 -0400 Message-Id: <200404061740.i36HeoT28142@makai.watson.ibm.com> To: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: htdig and sources.redhat.com loadavg In-Reply-To: Message from Christopher Faylor of "Mon, 05 Apr 2004 16:51:47 EDT." <20040405205147.GA21949@coc.bosbc.com> References: <200404051849.i35InoT27980@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20040405205147.GA21949@coc.bosbc.com> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 17:40:00 -0000 From: David Edelsohn X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2 2949 anoncvs 15 0 3868 1528 76 S 45.3 0.0 2:44 1 cvs 24943 htdigid 15 0 379M 79M 408 D 1.7 3.9 36:42 1 htdig Is 379M/79M for htdig really a good use of sourceware resources relative to buffer caches? David