From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@alum.bu.edu>
To: overseers@sources.redhat.com
Cc: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: gcc.gnu.org CVS meta-data corrupt?
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040408151845.GA9298@coc.bosbc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040408145345.GB12733@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 10:53:45AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>Hi -
>
>dje wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> Someone manually fsck'ed the filesystem with the latest reboot,
>> but the previous reboot showed a clean filesystem unmount avoiding an
>> automatic fsck?
>
>I don't know whether this morning a real fsck was done on the filesystems.
>I touched /forcefsck so next time (after the memory upgrade?), it'll all
>get checked for sure.
According to tune2fs, the last time a real fsck was performed on the
cvs filesystem was Tue May 13 22:06:19 2003. That doesn't seem right
to me, though. I thought Matt had done a check after that time.
The system was apparently down for three hours, too, so it seems like an
fsck might have been done. It's odd that none of the partitions that I
sampled reflected that fact, though.
cgf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-08 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-05 18:50 htdig and sources.redhat.com loadavg David Edelsohn
2004-04-05 19:36 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-05 19:46 ` Phil Edwards
2004-04-05 19:56 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2004-04-05 20:03 ` Phil Edwards
2004-04-05 20:36 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-05 21:15 ` Phil Edwards
2004-04-05 21:23 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-05 21:46 ` Phil Edwards
2004-04-05 22:11 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-05 22:26 ` Phil Edwards
2004-04-05 20:48 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2004-04-05 20:52 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-05 20:57 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-08 21:18 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2004-04-05 21:12 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-05 20:51 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-04-05 21:21 ` Matthew Galgoci
2004-04-05 23:36 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-06 0:06 ` Matthew Galgoci
2004-04-06 0:17 ` Matthew Galgoci
2004-04-06 0:29 ` Zack Weinberg
[not found] ` <cgf@alum.bu.edu>
2004-04-05 21:03 ` David Edelsohn
2004-04-05 21:08 ` Ian Lance Taylor
[not found] ` <ian@airs.com>
2004-04-05 21:14 ` David Edelsohn
2004-04-05 22:51 ` Jason Molenda
2004-04-05 23:39 ` GCC snapshot generation (was Re: htdig and sources.redhat.com loadavg) Zack Weinberg
2004-04-06 14:49 ` htdig and sources.redhat.com loadavg David Edelsohn
2004-04-06 16:18 ` Jonathan Larmour
2004-04-06 16:25 ` David Edelsohn
2004-04-06 16:34 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-06 16:39 ` Phil Edwards
2004-04-07 2:58 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-04-06 16:41 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-07 2:59 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-04-06 17:40 ` David Edelsohn
2004-04-06 18:00 ` Jonathan Larmour
2004-04-06 19:43 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-06 19:52 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-04-06 19:52 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2004-04-06 23:24 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2004-04-08 14:48 ` gcc.gnu.org CVS meta-data corrupt? David Edelsohn
2004-04-08 14:53 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2004-04-08 15:18 ` Christopher Faylor [this message]
2004-05-02 11:32 ` sourceware load problem again? David Edelsohn
2004-04-08 4:04 gcc.gnu.org CVS meta-data corrupt? David Edelsohn
2004-04-08 13:20 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-04-08 13:42 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2004-04-08 13:54 ` system rebooted (was Re: gcc.gnu.org CVS meta-data corrupt?) Christopher Faylor
2004-04-08 13:42 ` gcc.gnu.org CVS meta-data corrupt? Frank Ch. Eigler
2004-04-08 14:13 ` David Edelsohn
2004-04-08 14:21 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-04-08 4:33 David Edelsohn
2004-04-08 4:50 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-04-08 13:46 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-04-08 19:06 ` law
2004-04-08 19:54 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-04-08 16:12 ` Matthew Galgoci
2004-04-29 19:40 sourceware load problem again? David Edelsohn
2004-04-29 19:45 ` Christopher Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040408151845.GA9298@coc.bosbc.com \
--to=cgf@alum.bu.edu \
--cc=dje@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=overseers@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).