From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <overseers-return-6976-listarch-overseers=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26387 invoked by alias); 18 May 2004 15:11:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-help@sources.redhat.com>,
	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26362 invoked from network); 18 May 2004 15:11:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO timesys.com) (66.30.22.40)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 May 2004 15:11:28 -0000
Received: by timesys.com (Postfix, from userid 201)
	id BC1F9400108; Tue, 18 May 2004 11:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 15:48:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@alum.bu.edu>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
Cc: overseers@sourceware.org
Subject: htdig chewing up time but maybe it's normal?
Message-ID: <20040518151127.GA10610@coe.bosbc.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>,
	overseers@sourceware.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2

The load average is wavering between 17 and 22 on sourceware and I
see our old frined htdig running.

H-P is this ok or should we be worrying?

cgf