From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1005 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2004 22:05:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 972 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2004 22:05:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO foam.wonderslug.com) (67.114.163.186) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2004 22:05:45 -0000 Received: by foam.wonderslug.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DE0FDE3A68; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from foam.wonderslug.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by foam.wonderslug.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEFEE3A67; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:08:50 -0700 (PDT) To: Ian Lance Taylor Cc: Jonathan Larmour , Gerald Pfeifer , overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: removing login rights from non-overseers In-reply-to: Your message of 10 Jun 2004 17:29:14 EDT. Reply-To: angela@wonderslug.com Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 22:25:00 -0000 From: Angela Marie Thomas Message-Id: <20040610220850.DE0FDE3A68@foam.wonderslug.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00519.txt.bz2 > Jonathan Larmour writes: > > > Sudo is a lot simpler but does mean many people still retain complete > > and interactive shell access. > > sudo permits restricting which commands can be executed. I don't know > whether we can realistically use that, though. > > Ian Would you set it up unpassworded for certain people for certain operations? Not everyone does, or should, have a real password on the machine. --Angela