[Bug web/15652] gcc.gnu.org cvsweb download is broken

[Bug web/15652] gcc.gnu.org cvsweb download is broken

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-05-25 18:46 -------
A job for the overseers. oh, confirmed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |overseers at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-05-25 18:46:56
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15652

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Re: [Bug web/15652] gcc.gnu.org cvsweb download is broken

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 369 bytes --]

Hi -

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15652

While investigating this just a tad, it occurred to me that
anoncvs should not require such a huge membership list any
more.  Now that cvs lock files are put someplace other than
the project tree, UNIX "other" permissions should be enough
for anoncvs to work.  And indeed on a few tests, it does work.

- FChE

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [Bug web/15652] gcc.gnu.org cvsweb download is broken

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

Hi, Chris -


> >While investigating this just a tad, it occurred to me that anoncvs
> >should not require such a huge membership list any more.  [...]
> 
> Search the overseers archives.  

(Sorry, couldn't find anything relevant with a few search probes.)

> The locking doesn't work for uberbaum.

I am not familiar with uberbaum's intricacies, but does anoncvs have
to lock anything there?  Are some directories accidentally just not
"chmod o+rx"?


- FChE

Re: [Bug web/15652] gcc.gnu.org cvsweb download is broken

[Christopher Faylor]

On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 03:07:16PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15652
>
>While investigating this just a tad, it occurred to me that anoncvs
>should not require such a huge membership list any more.  Now that cvs
>lock files are put someplace other than the project tree, UNIX "other"
>permissions should be enough for anoncvs to work.  And indeed on a few
>tests, it does work.

Search the overseers archives.  The locking doesn't work for uberbaum.

cgf

[Bug web/15652] gcc.gnu.org cvsweb download is broken

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-05-26 11:20 -------
I think the workaround that was put in for sourceware should also be put in for gcc's cvsweb.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15652

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug web/15652] gcc.gnu.org cvsweb download is broken

[ian at wasabisystems dot com]

------- Additional Comments From ian at wasabisystems dot com  2004-05-26 12:24 -------
Fixed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15652

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug web/15652] gcc.gnu.org cvsweb download is broken

[fcusack at fcusack dot com]

------- Additional Comments From fcusack at fcusack dot com  2004-06-17 03:46 -------
 verified 

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |VERIFIED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15652

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.