From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3530 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2005 05:09:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3395 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2005 05:08:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2005 05:08:52 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 83AB21B52C; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:10:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:29:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: overseers@sources.redhat.com, Benjamin Kosnik , Ian Lance Taylor Subject: Re: is gcc-maintainers list working? Message-ID: <20050223051049.GA24817@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: overseers@sources.redhat.com, Benjamin Kosnik , Ian Lance Taylor References: <20050222131548.2a86cea5@belmont.artheist.org> <20050222221417.6a2c16b6@belmont.artheist.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050222221417.6a2c16b6@belmont.artheist.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2005-q1/txt/msg00270.txt.bz2 On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:14:17PM -0600, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: >> Try sending an e-mail message to it. > >No worky. No bounce either. > >I'm just point this out because I believe some mail from the FSF >copyright clerk has not been posted on that list. I'm not sure if this needs to be said or not, but AFAIK this isn't really an issue for the overseers list. gcc-maintainers isn't hosted here. cgf