From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13797 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2005 14:56:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13735 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2005 14:56:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2005 14:56:23 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id C4B7913C0BA; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 09:56:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 14:56:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: overseers@sourceware.org, James E Wilson Subject: Re: rms asking about badspammer.html Message-ID: <20050401145623.GD25636@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: overseers@sourceware.org, James E Wilson References: <1112316742.3679.39.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1112316742.3679.39.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-q2/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 04:52:22PM -0800, James E Wilson wrote: >rms saw a user bug report about the badspammer.html file on gcc.gnu.org, >and started asking the GCC SC about it. We told him it was to frustrate >spam bots, and users with properly working browsers should never see >it. Now rms is asking how effective it is, who wrote it, whether they >can use it on other GNU servers, etc. These are questions the GCC SC >can't answer. Anyone want to take this up with rms? Or give us some >pointers where to look for more info? Check out /www/conf/spamblock. cgf