[Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]

[Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]

[Jonathan Larmour]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 602 bytes --]

Can anyone make sense of this bounce to ecos-discuss-owner? It was one of 
about a dozen.

It seems to imply that something was sending mail back to 
sources.redhat.com (rightly or wrongly) and got rejected. But from what I 
can see badmailfrom on sourceware has only three addresses, two at 
netscape.net, one at indiatimes.com.

I couldn't find the relevant logs either. The ones in /var/log/qmail 
didn't seem to have anything and /usr/src/qpsmtpd-dev/log/main 
(/usr/src???) had already expired entries this old.

Jifl
-- 
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine

[-- Attachment #2: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 9108 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.1.1: Notification --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 564 bytes --]

This is the Postfix program at host wip-cdctls-mx3.wipro.com.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.

For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>

If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.

			The Postfix program

<ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org>: host sources.redhat.com[12.107.209.250]
    said: 550 sorry, your envelope sender is in my badmailfrom list (in reply
    to RCPT TO command)

[-- Attachment #2.1.2: Delivery report --]
[-- Type: message/delivery-status, Size: 452 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.1.3: Undelivered Message --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 5534 bytes --]

From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: Steven_cheng <05071@alphanetworks.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, eCos Discussion <ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [ECOS] who use the RAM block between 0x0 and 0xfcb8 ??
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 05:28:22 -0600
Message-ID: <1124969303.28508.186.camel@hermes>

On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 11:34 +0800, Steven_cheng wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> Thank you for your reply! But I have a question.
> 
>     Can I move the RedBoot workspace to other address, because I have
> an application located at 0x0.  I hope to empty the address 0x0 in the ROM /
> ROMRAM modes
> 
> How can I do for it ??

I don't know what platform/architecture you are using, but moving the
data space (RedBoot's workspace) to another location, while possible,
is probably a non-trivial job.

What kind of application do you have/need at 0x0?

> 
> Thank you~~
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gary Thomas" <gary@mlbassoc.com>
> To: "Steven_cheng" <05071@alphanetworks.com>
> Cc: "eCos Discussion" <ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 8:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] who use the RAM block between 0x0 and 0xfcb8 ??
> 
> 
> > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 17:50 +0800, Steven_cheng wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > >     I have one question about the RAM memory usage, because I
> > > found that the RAM address 0x0 -0xfcb8 is always used.
> > >
> > > The following list is presented in my environmenet:
> > >
> > > 1. ROM mode:
> > > RAM: 0x00000000-0x10000000, [0x0000fcb8-0x0ffdd000] available
> > >
> >
> > This is the workspace (variables, etc) for RedBoot
> >
> > > 2. ROMRAM mode:
> > > RAM: 0x00000000-0x10000000, [0x00042678-0x0ffdd000] available
> > >
> >
> > Workspace + RedBoot code (instructions)
> >
> > > 3: RAM mode:
> > > RAM: 0x00000000-0x10000000, [0x0007ebf8-0x0ffdd000] available
> > >
> >
> > Workspace + RedBoot code (instructions), this time loaded at a
> > higher address which does not conflict with what is used in
> > ROMRAM mode.
> >
> > >
> > > Anybody can tell me who use the RAM block between 0x0 and 0xfcb8 ??
> > >
> > > Thank you~~
> > >
> >
> > -- 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
> > MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
> > and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
> >
> 
> 
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

Re: [Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]

[Ian Lance Taylor]

Jonathan Larmour <jifl@jifvik.org> writes:

> Can anyone make sense of this bounce to ecos-discuss-owner? It was one
> of about a dozen.
> 
> It seems to imply that something was sending mail back to
> sources.redhat.com (rightly or wrongly) and got rejected. But from
> what I can see badmailfrom on sourceware has only three addresses, two
> at netscape.net, one at indiatimes.com.
> 
> I couldn't find the relevant logs either. The ones in /var/log/qmail
> didn't seem to have anything and /usr/src/qpsmtpd-dev/log/main
> (/usr/src???) had already expired entries this old.

We run qpsmtpd, instead of the standard qmail-smtpd, for additional
spam checking.  The relevant badmailfrom is
    /usr/src/qpsmtpd-dev/config/badmailfrom
In that file, I see ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org.  And in
the bounce message I see:

> X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org

But I don't know where that came from.

Ian

Re: [Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]

[Christopher Faylor]

On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:25:56PM +0100, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>Can anyone make sense of this bounce to ecos-discuss-owner? It was one of 
>about a dozen.
>
>It seems to imply that something was sending mail back to 
>sources.redhat.com (rightly or wrongly) and got rejected. But from what I 
>can see badmailfrom on sourceware has only three addresses, two at 
>netscape.net, one at indiatimes.com.
>
>I couldn't find the relevant logs either. The ones in /var/log/qmail 
>didn't seem to have anything and /usr/src/qpsmtpd-dev/log/main 
>(/usr/src???) had already expired entries this old.

List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ecos-discuss-unsubscribe-santoshkumar.zalake=wipro.com@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-discuss-subscribe@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org>, <http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org

These come from the above user, apparently.  I've unsubscribed him.

cgf