From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31718 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2005 05:45:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 31676 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2005 05:45:46 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 08:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051210054546.31675.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo References: Subject: [Bug web/3119] Broken gcc mailing list archives In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org From: "me at cgf dot cx" Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-q4/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from me at cgf dot cx 2005-12-10 05:45 ------- Subject: Re: Broken gcc mailing list archives On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 05:30:21AM -0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > >-- > >pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: > > What |Removed |Added >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Last reconfirmed|2005-09-07 16:53:59 |2005-12-10 05:30:21 > date| | > > >http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119 > >------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- >You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. Given the age of these bugs should we just close them as "wontfix"? I don't see anyone stepping up to fix them anytime soon. cgf -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.