From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <overseers-return-9461-listarch-overseers=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 727 invoked by alias); 12 May 2007 04:07:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 634 invoked by uid 22791); 12 May 2007 04:07:15 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from pool-71-248-179-68.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (71.248.179.68)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 May 2007 04:07:11 +0000
Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201)
	id CFE9B2B353; Sat, 12 May 2007 00:07:06 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 04:07:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <me@cgf.cx>
To: overseers@sourceware.org
Subject: mecurial?
Message-ID: <20070512040706.GA1088@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mail-Followup-To: overseers@sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12)
Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <overseers.sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-help@sourceware.org>,
	<http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2

I notice that Dan apparently added mecurial support to rash and added
mecurial to /usr/bin (and not via an rpm?).

If this was discussed somewhere, could someone point me to the
discussion?

If it was not discussed then, Dan, please explain.

cgf