From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16898 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2007 02:47:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 16887 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Sep 2007 02:47:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-71-174-251-188.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO ednor.cgf.cx) (71.174.251.188) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:47:24 +0000 Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 82A312B353; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:47:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:47:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: remove mail-archives from ftp? Message-ID: <20070925024722.GA31521@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: overseers@sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 Someone in crossgcc is complaining because they found a mirror of the ftp mailing list archives on a random other site. Are there any objections to my removing these archives and shutting down the automatic copying to the ftp area? I think this practice has probably outlived its usefulness in this spam-filled era. cgf (I know you can regenerate the web archives from these but I don't think that is worth the downside of this practice)