From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4370 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2007 17:01:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 4360 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2007 17:01:58 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:01:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lAEH1p0j017464; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:01:51 -0500 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (lacrosse.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.154]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id lAEH1pXv031104; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:01:51 -0500 Received: from concorde.artheist.org (vpn-14-60.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.60]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id lAEH1ohJ001724; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:01:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:01:00 -0000 From: Benjamin Kosnik To: "Daniel Berlin" Cc: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, "Johannes Singler" Subject: Re: can somebody please help w/ bugzilla privs? Message-ID: <20071114110152.622ea6f1@concorde.artheist.org> In-Reply-To: <4aca3dc20711140841n46cc07fm9af5c3fd36bf12b1@mail.gmail.com> References: <9f71cef00711071103u63a4b130gce9863d74df076a@mail.gmail.com> <20071114100918.170d4b49@concorde.artheist.org> <4aca3dc20711140841n46cc07fm9af5c3fd36bf12b1@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q4/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 Hey Daniel. Thanks for the reply. > His singler@gcc.gnu.org will automatically have all the right privs. > His singler@ira.uka.de will not. A ha. > I suggest using singler@gcc.gnu.org (i'm happy to merge the accounts). I'll let Johanne decide on this, but it seems like the easier way to go. (Isn't this the way bkoz@redhat.com and bkoz@gcc.gnu.org is set up?) -benjamin