From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26703 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2009 15:29:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 26689 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Sep 2009 15:29:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:29:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8EFTEJD031376; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:29:15 -0400 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-241-156.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.241.156]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8EFTEQL013616; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:29:14 -0400 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id AAAAB580F6; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:29:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:29:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, gp@gcc.gnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , zlaski@gcc.gnu.org, Ian Lance Taylor Subject: Re: removing gp and zlaski's access to the GCC repository Message-ID: <20090914152913.GA5225@redhat.com> References: <4AAE0767.4040700@redhat.com> <20090914152625.GA7358@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090914152625.GA7358@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 Hi - On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:26:25AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > [...] > >The way to do that is to delete them from /etc/passwd. Is that what we > >should do here? Should we save any indication of their accounts? I > >can't see that it matters much. > > I have a script which backs up the account and the /etc/passwd /etc/group > records. I'll try to dig it out and delete these two accounts. FWIW, there is a small amount of value in keeping the accounts around (but logins disabled and /home cleaned up I guess) -- that is that then the userid@{gcc,sourceware} is a unique id in the version control histories. - FChE